Autumn Care of Mechanicsville

7600 Autumn Parkway, Mechanicsville, VA 23116 (opens Google Maps) · Hanover County · (804) 730-0009· 169 certified beds · avg 164 residents/day · certified since Mar 8, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Feb 26, 2025

Serious findings on record

$10,358

Fines, last 3 years

3.05

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 33 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Feb 26, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
Feb 26, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
Feb 26, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692

View all 33 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 26, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Feb 26, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Feb 26, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Feb 26, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 26, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · F-0559
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' right to refuse certain moves within the nursing home that they did not ask for, such as being switched between units. Residents have a say in where they live inside the facility. · F-0560
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Feb 26, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals. · from a complaint · F-0810
Dec 1, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
Dec 1, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Dec 1, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Dec 1, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases. · F-0885
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Dec 1, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Jun 10, 2021	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 10, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Jun 10, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Jun 10, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Jun 10, 2021	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 16).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2021

2022

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2021	5	E
2022	11	E
2025	17	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $10,358.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Feb 26, 2025	Fine	$10,358

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.05

3.67

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.44

0.66

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.64

3.21

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Virginia avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.05	3.67	3.95	bottom 26% in Virginia; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.44	0.66	0.69	bottom 34% in Virginia; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.64	3.21	3.50	bottom 28% in Virginia; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.32	0.46	0.48	bottom 45% in Virginia; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	32.1	48.1	45.8	top 15% in Virginia; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	39.1	48.2	42.9	top 34% in Virginia; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.43, RN 0.50, weekend 2.97.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.43 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Autumn Care of Mechanicsville. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
SHG Autumn, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	03/01/2016
Cibc Bank USA	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/31/2021
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020	Organization	Trustee of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2023
Dharanikota, Padmalatha	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2021
Hopkins, Joseph	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/08/2023
Hopkins, Joseph	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/08/2023
Legette, Pamela	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	07/12/2021
Legette, Pamela	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/12/2021
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Nicoluzakis, Gregory	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Ohl Asset (VA) Mechanicsville, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Ohl Asset (VA) Mechanicsville, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
Saber Governance LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2016
SHG Autumn, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/09/2025
SHG Management LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2019
SHG Mt, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/09/2025
Volpe, Benjamin	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019
Volpe, Benjamin	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2019

Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Saber Healthcare Group — 126 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Autumn Care of Norfolk — Norfolk, VA · overall 4/5
Autumn Care of Portsmouth — Portsmouth, VA · overall 4/5
Autumn Care of Suffolk — Suffolk, VA · overall 2/5
Berea Health & Rehab Center — Fredericksburg, VA · overall 2/5
Chatham Health & Rehabilitation Center — Chatham, VA · overall 4/5
Clarksville Health & Rehab Center — Clarksville, VA · overall 4/5
Colonial Health & Rehab Center, LLC — Virginia Beach, VA · overall 1/5
Dockside Health & Rehab Center — Locust Hill, VA · overall 4/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 125 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How often are beds and bed rails inspected, and who does those checks?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
"How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
"Under what circumstances would you move a resident to a different room or unit, and can they refuse?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Virginia midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 27 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Covenant Woods Nursing Home	0.6 mi	Mechanicsville, VA	★★★★☆	4/5
Hanover Health and Rehabilitation Center	0.7 mi	Mechanicsville, VA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Westminster-Canterbury of Richmond	6.2 mi	Richmond, VA	★★★★★	4/5
Henrico Health & Rehabilitation Center	6.3 mi	Highland Springs, VA		—/5	SFF
Lakeside Health & Rehabilitation	6.6 mi	Richmond, VA	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Vcu Health Children's Services at Brook Road	6.6 mi	Richmond, VA	★★★★★	5/5
Rosedale Health & Rehabilitation	6.8 mi	Richmond, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Parham Health Care & Rehab Center	7.7 mi	Richmond, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center	8.8 mi	Richmond, VA	★★☆☆☆	1/5
The Virginia Home	8.9 mi	Richmond, VA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
Elizabeth Adam Crump Health and Rehab	9.8 mi	Glen Allen, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Westport Rehabilitation and Nursing Center	10.1 mi	Richmond, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Hanover, VA — 4 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Ashland Nursing and Rehabilitation — Ashland, VA · overall 1/5abuseSFF

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Mechanicsville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495413.