ColoradoColorado Springs

Springs Village Care Center

110 W Van Buren St, Colorado Springs, CO 80907 · El Paso County · 91 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1989

Part of chain: STELLAR SENIOR LIVING (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$26,845
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0550

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 14, 2023 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 19, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (35)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Feb 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 14, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide residents with enough to drink, or with drinks matching their needs and preferences, to keep them properly hydrated.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (16 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023163G ▲
202440D
2025140E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $26,845, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 14, 2023Fine$26,845
Sep 14, 2023Payment Denial6 days from Oct 13, 2023

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityColorado avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.243.893.95bottom 19% in Colorado; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.760.860.69bottom 45% in Colorado; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.873.443.50bottom 20% in Colorado; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.610.48bottom 46% in Colorado; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)57.047.145.8bottom 21% in Colorado; bottom 21% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.344.642.9top 5% in Colorado; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.17, RN 0.74, weekend 2.80. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Charles Schwab & Co INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/22/2024
D.e. Shaw & Co., L.P.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/22/2024
Diversified Healthcare TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2020
H/2 Special Opportunities IV L.P.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/22/2024
SNH Proj Lincoln TRS LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2024
SNH TRS Licensee Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2020
SNH TRS, INC.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2020
Sptihs Properties TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2024
Abp TrustOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/22/2024
Abp TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025
Benton, EvrettIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Benton, EvrettIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2021
Bilotto, ChristopherIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Bilotto, ChristopherIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Bilotto, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Bilotto, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Blackrock INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/22/2024
Blackrock INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025
Brown, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023
Brown, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Healthcare Resort of Colorado Springs1.1 miColorado Springs, CO★★★☆☆2/5
Center at Centennial, the1.5 miColorado Springs, CO★★★★★4/5
Colonial Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC1.7 miColorado Springs, CO★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Pikes Peak Post Acute2.2 miColorado Springs, CO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Kiowa Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing, LLC2.2 miColorado Springs, CO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sundance Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation2.6 miColorado Springs, CO★★☆☆☆2/5
Bear Creek Senior Living2.6 miColorado Springs, CO★★★★☆4/5
Medallion Post Acute Rehabilitation2.7 miColorado Springs, CO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Gardens, the2.8 miColorado Springs, CO★★★★★5/5
Sunny Vista Living Center3.1 miColorado Springs, CO★★★☆☆3/5
Brookdale Skyline3.3 miColorado Springs, CO★★★★★3/5
Advanced Health Care of Colorado Springs3.7 miColorado Springs, CO★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Colorado Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065247.