ColoradoBrush

South Platte Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC

2200 Edison St, Brush, CO 80723 · Morgan County · 78 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Oct 14, 1982

Part of chain: THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS (19 facilities, chain avg rating 1.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$36,236
Fines, last 3 years
3.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 15, 2025 · F-0695 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 7, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 7, 2025 · F-0742 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Why it matters: Residents with mental health needs who go untreated can suffer worsening symptoms, distress, and isolation.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Oct 15, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint
Oct 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 8, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 18, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
May 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.
Sep 26, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 26, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Sep 26, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930E
202350F
202440E
202563J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $36,236.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 15, 2025Fine$25,273
Jan 7, 2025Fine$10,963

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityColorado avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.113.893.95bottom 15% in Colorado; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.860.69bottom 6% in Colorado; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.823.443.50bottom 18% in Colorado; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.610.48bottom 16% in Colorado; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.747.145.8bottom 8% in Colorado; bottom 10% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)100.044.642.9bottom 1% in Colorado; bottom 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.49, weekend 3.07. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Mahrt, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Myers, KatieIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Myers, WalterIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Swain, HollyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Swain, JaredIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Cottonwood Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Davis, EdwardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2025
Davis, EdwardIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/26/2025
Rai, PradeepIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2025
Slattery & Holman P.C.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2025
Slattery & Holman P.C.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/07/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Eben Ezer Lutheran Care Center0.5 miBrush, CO★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Valley View Villa7.4 miFort Morgan, CO★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Brush →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 065170.