How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Chase City Health and Rehab Center
5539 Highway Forty Seven, Chase City, VA 23924 (opens Google Maps) · Mecklenburg County · (434) 372-8885· 120 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Nov 3, 2004 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 16, 2023
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 18, 2019
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.52
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 18, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 18, 2019 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 21, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint F-0559
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint F-0641
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand. · from a complaint · F-0559 |
| Dec 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Mar 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Mar 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 16, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 29, 2021 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Apr 18, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2021
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 9 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.52
Virginia average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.23
Virginia average: 0.66
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.23
Virginia average: 3.21
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.52 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 38% in Virginia; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.23 | 0.66 | 0.69 | bottom 1% in Virginia; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.23 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 32% in Virginia; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.15 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 6% in Virginia; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 52.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Virginia; bottom 31% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 72.7 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 13% in Virginia; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.41, RN 0.23, weekend 3.13.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.41 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Chase City Health and Rehab Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bdsheffer LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2004 |
| DJ Petrine LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2004 |
| Goodall, Lury | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2004 |
| Petrine, Deborah | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/17/2025 |
| Petrine, Deborah | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2004 |
| Petrine, James | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2002 |
| Sheffer, Brady | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2004 |
| Stallard, Patricia | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/12/2004 |
| Alesantrino, Joe | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2019 |
| Alesantrino, Joe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2019 |
| Brochero, Alfonso | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2026 |
| Coleman, Amanda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2025 |
| Commonwealth Care of Roanoke INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2004 |
| Commonwealth Care of Roanoke INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2025 |
| Daniels, Elaine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| M&t Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2001 |
| Parrott, Robin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2013 |
| Parrott, Robin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2015 |
| Petrine, Deborah | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/21/2001 |
| Quality Care Rehab INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 22 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 2 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Commonwealth Care of Roanoke — 12 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Dinwiddie Health and Rehab Center — Petersburg, VA · overall 2/5
- Dulles Health & Rehab Center — Herndon, VA · overall 4/5
- Gainesville Health and Rehab Center — Gainesville, VA · overall 3/5
- Lee Health and Rehab Center — Pennington Gap, VA · overall 5/5
- Manassas Health and Rehab Center — Manassas, VA · overall 3/5
- Potomac Falls Health & Rehab Center — Sterling, VA · overall 3/5
- Radford Health and Rehab Center — Radford, VA · overall 4/5
- River View on the Appomattox Health & Rehab Center — Hopewell, VA · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 11 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you handle room assignments and roommate requests, and do residents get advance written notice before any move?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 53% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 22 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarksville Health & Rehab Center | 13.6 mi | Clarksville, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Nursing | 18.7 mi | South Hill, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Wayland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 18.8 mi | Keysville, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495380.