Dinwiddie Health and Rehab Center
46 Diamond Drive, Petersburg, VA 23803 · Petersburg City County · 60 certified beds · avg 55 residents/day · certified since Oct 28, 2008
Part of chain: COMMONWEALTH CARE OF ROANOKE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 3, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Aug 5, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (30)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jan 15, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Feb 7, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Jun 23, 2022 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. |
| Mar 11, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 14).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 14 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $8,278.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2025 | Fine | $8,278 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.46 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 42% in Virginia; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.66 | 0.69 | bottom 29% in Virginia; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.95 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 48% in Virginia; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 33% in Virginia; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in Virginia; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 70.0 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 15% in Virginia; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.91, RN 0.47, weekend 3.34. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bdsheffer LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/09/2008 |
| Goodall, Lury | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/09/2008 |
| Petrine, James | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2020 |
| Sheffer, Brady | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/09/2008 |
| Stallard, Patricia | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2020 |
| Alesantrino, Joe | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2019 |
| Alesantrino, Joe | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2019 |
| Bdsheffer LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2020 |
| Commonwealth Care of Roanoke INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/14/2007 |
| Commonwealth Care of Roanoke INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2025 |
| DJ Petrine LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2020 |
| Goodall, Lury | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2020 |
| Hamidi, Adam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2025 |
| Overstreet, Andrew | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Overstreet, Andrew | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2022 |
| Petrine, Deborah | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2008 |
| Petrine, Deborah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2020 |
| Petrine, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/15/2020 |
| Sevier, John | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2012 |
| Sheffer, Brady | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2005 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hiram W Davis Medical Ctr | 3.1 mi | Petersburg, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Petersburg Healthcare Center | 5.9 mi | Petersburg, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Battlefield Park Healthcare Center | 5.9 mi | Petersburg, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Colonial Heights Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 7.3 mi | Colonial Heights, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Wonder City Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 10.3 mi | Hopewell, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Tyler's Retreat at Iron Bridge | 11.7 mi | Chester, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| River View on the Appomattox Health & Rehab Center | 12.8 mi | Hopewell, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Health Care Center Lucy Corr | 13.8 mi | Chesterfield, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Petersburg →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495398.