VirginiaSouth Hill

Twin Lakes Rehabilitation and Nursing

125 Buena Vista Circle, South Hill, VA 23970 · Mecklenburg County · 140 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Oct 14, 1987

Part of chain: EASTERN HEALTHCARE GROUP (18 facilities, chain avg rating 1.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.28
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 30, 2019 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 30, 2019 · F-0688

The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.

Why it matters: Without this care, residents can develop stiff, contracted joints and lose the ability to move on their own.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 30, 2019 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 3, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 3, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 10, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jun 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 30, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 30, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
May 30, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 30, 2019F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 30, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 30, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 30, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy.
May 30, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 30, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
May 30, 2019C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019163G ▲
202150E
202360E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityVirginia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.283.673.95bottom 43% in Virginia; bottom 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.350.660.69bottom 17% in Virginia; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.213.50top 48% in Virginia; bottom 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.200.460.48bottom 18% in Virginia; bottom 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)72.048.145.8bottom 3% in Virginia; bottom 5% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)84.248.242.9bottom 5% in Virginia; bottom 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.33, weekend 2.78. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
A&j Pomona Enterprises LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%04/01/2025
Lyam Eastern Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest45%04/01/2025
Lyam Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest45%04/01/2025
VA SNF Operations Holdings 5 LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2025
A&j Pomona Enterprises LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Ackerman, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Bankwell BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Gittleson, LaylaIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/25/2025
Gittleson, YehudaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Gittleson, YehudaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Gittleson, YehudaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Lyam Eastern Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Lyam Family TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Samuels, ShondelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Samuels, ShondelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Shapiro, AkivaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
Shapiro, AkivaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
South Hill VA Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
VA SNF Master Consulting LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2025
VA SNF Master Consulting LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lawrenceville Health & Rehabilitation16.5 miLawrenceville, VA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Wayland Nursing and Rehabilitation Center18.4 miKeysville, VA★★★★☆3/5
Chase City Health and Rehab Center18.7 miChase City, VA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in South Hill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495177.