13500 Breton Ridge, Houston, TX 77070 (opens Google Maps) · Harris County · (281) 807-4744· 98 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since Sep 15, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Feb 25, 2025 · F-0584 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Why it matters: An unsafe or unclean environment affects residents' health, comfort, and dignity every single day.
Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 20, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 28, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 23, 2026 · F-0677
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Why it matters: Residents who don't get this help can suffer poor hygiene, skin breakdown, weight loss, and a loss of dignity.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 28, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 23, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 17, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Feb 25, 2025 | ▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Aug 14, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 4 | 1 | L ▲ |
| 2026 | 8 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $44,335.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2026 | Fine | $13,065 |
| Feb 14, 2025 | Fine | $31,270 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.72 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 24% in Texas; bottom 48% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.83 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 6% in Texas; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.19 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 29% in Texas; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 20% in Texas; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.9 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 49% in Texas; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 58.3 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.79, weekend 3.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Champions Healthcare at Willowbrook. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakbend Medical Center | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/01/2023 |
| Agana, Benjamin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Agana, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Agana, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Eapen, Sheila | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Eapen, Sheila | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Eapen, Sheila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/21/2023 |
| Freudenberger, Joseph | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Holman Health Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Marshall Lake Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| Marshall Lake Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/17/2025 |
| Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
| The Ensign Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2023 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 1.0 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| North Houston Transitional Care | 1.3 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fallbrook Rehabilitation and Care Center | 3.8 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Park Manor of Cyfair | 3.8 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center - | 4.6 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Villa Toscana at Cypress Woods | 5.0 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cypress Creek Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 5.2 mi | Cypress, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Paradigm at Woodwind Lakes | 6.3 mi | Houston, TX | —/5 | SFF | |
| Eagle Crest Rapid Recovery | 6.5 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Avir at Veterans Memorial | 6.8 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Paradigm Northwest | 7.0 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Cypress Pointe Health & Wellness | 7.0 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Harris, TX — 97 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676236.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details