TexasSan Marcos

Hays Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

1900 Medical Parkway, San Marcos, TX 78666 · Hays County · 116 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1991

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$8,226
Fines, last 3 years
3.63
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 2, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 2, 2024 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.

Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
May 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 14, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Dec 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390F
202452J ▲
202560E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,226.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 2, 2024Fine$8,226

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.633.463.95top 28% in Texas; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.440.69top 25% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.013.043.50top 40% in Texas; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.220.340.48bottom 27% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.955.345.8top 16% in Texas; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.254.642.9top 10% in Texas; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.46, weekend 2.72. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Guadalupe County Hospital BoardOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2020
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Chudleigh, JamesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Chudleigh, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Chudleigh, JamesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2024
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2020
Gann, KodyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2021
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Phelps, NelsonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Phelps, NelsonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Phelps, NelsonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
San Marcos TX Propco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Willow Springs Creek Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2020
Willow Springs Creek Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/25/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Cypress Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center0.6 miSan Marcos, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.9 miSan Marcos, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - New Br11.6 miNew Braunfels, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation-Kyle12.0 miKyle, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Sundance Inn Health Center12.2 miNew Braunfels, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Avir at New Braunfels12.3 miNew Braunfels, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Deer Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation13.1 miWimberley, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Eden Home14.3 miNew Braunfels, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Chisolm Trail Nursing and Rehabilitation Center15.8 miLockhart, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Parkview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center16.6 miLockhart, TX★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Kirkwood Manor16.8 miNew Braunfels, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Avir at Walnut Springs18.6 miSeguin, TX★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in San Marcos →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455960.