WisconsinCumberland

Care and Rehab - Cumberland

1100 7th Ave, Cumberland, WI 54829 · Barron County · 50 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 2013

Part of chain: CARE & REHAB (6 facilities, chain avg rating 3.5★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 18, 2026 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 18, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 18, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Sep 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jul 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Sep 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380D
202430D
202520E
2026101G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 18, 2026Payment Denial76 days from Mar 19, 2026

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.674.293.95top 30% in Wisconsin; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.951.010.69top 48% in Wisconsin; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.193.843.50top 32% in Wisconsin; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.680.48bottom 49% in Wisconsin; top 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)33.346.945.8top 14% in Wisconsin; top 20% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)10.039.742.9top 4% in Wisconsin; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.56, RN 0.93, weekend 4.09. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Thayer, GrantIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2017
Bechtel, JessicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Bechtel, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Corton, NicolaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/05/2023
Corton, NicolaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/05/2023
Cumberland Campus LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2025
Lingen, ThomasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Lingen, ThomasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Sadowska, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Sadowska, TimothyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/10/2025
Senior Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Senior Management INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/27/2025
Thayer, GrantIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Thayer, GrantIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Thayer, GrantIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2025
Thayer, GrantIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Voeltz, KristinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018
Voeltz, KristinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Barron Care and Rehabilitation12.2 miBarron, WI★☆☆☆☆2/5
Dove Healthcare - Rice Lake13.3 miRice Lake, WI★★★★★4/5
Heritage Lakeside14.5 miRice Lake, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Shell Lake Health Care Center16.3 miShell Lake, WI★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cumberland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525712.