23332 Red Arrow Highway, Mattawan, MI 49071 (opens Google Maps) · Van Buren County · (269) 283-5200· 100 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Aug 15, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 12, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint F-0727
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint · F-0727 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 12, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 16, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Apr 19, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Apr 19, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 11 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 2 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2025 | Payment Denial | 21 days from Jul 8, 2025 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Michigan avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.04 | 4.32 | 3.95 | top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.65 | 0.84 | 0.69 | top 4% in Michigan; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.48 | 3.79 | 3.50 | top 14% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.01 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 6% in Michigan; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.3 | 44.1 | 45.8 | top 38% in Michigan; top 37% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 10.7 | 39.2 | 42.9 | top 6% in Michigan; top 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.43, RN 1.45, weekend 3.94.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.43 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bronson Commons. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronson Health Care Group INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 07/01/2011 |
| Allen, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Arnan, Martinson | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Arnan, Martinson | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Bronson Health Care Group INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/31/2016 |
| Chen-Zhang, Lynn | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2022 |
| Colegrove, Leigh | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2021 |
| Colegrove, Leigh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/11/2021 |
| Coleman, Genevieve | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| East, Rebecca | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| East, Rebecca | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Falahee, James | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2014 |
| Falahee, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/1987 |
| Gibson, Scott | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/28/2012 |
| Goel, Ashutosh | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2025 |
| Goel, Ashutosh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/21/2025 |
| Gonzalez, Jorge | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Hermsen, Katharine | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Hoffman, Kellie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Hunt, Brenda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2011 |
Showing 20 of 45 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 25 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medilodge of Kalamazoo | 6.7 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Friendship Village | 8.2 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Medilodge of Westwood | 8.6 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Medilodge of Portage | 10.2 mi | Portage, MI | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center | 10.9 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Alamo Cove Rehab and Nursing Center | 11.0 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Villa at Borgess Place | 13.3 mi | Kalamazoo, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Plainwell | 15.5 mi | Plainwell, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi | 16.4 mi | Plainwell, MI | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The Laurels of Galesburg | 18.4 mi | Galesburg, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Orchards at Three Rivers | 18.5 mi | Three Rivers, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Ely Manor | 19.6 mi | Allegan, MI | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Van Buren, MI — 2 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235434.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details