Bronson Commons

23332 Red Arrow Highway, Mattawan, MI 49071 (opens Google Maps) · Van Buren County · (269) 283-5200· 100 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Aug 15, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Jun 12, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent Mar 12, 2026

Fines, last 3 years

5.04

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 12, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Mar 25, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 12, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Mar 12, 2026J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
Mar 12, 2026F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint F-0727
Jun 12, 2025G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689

View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 12, 2026	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Mar 12, 2026	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint · F-0727
Jun 12, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Jun 12, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692
Jun 12, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 12, 2025	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
May 16, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698
Apr 19, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	5	0	F
2024	3	0	D
2025	11	1	G ▲
2026	2	1	J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Jun 12, 2025	Payment Denial	21 days from Jul 8, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMichigan averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

5.04

4.32

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

1.65

0.84

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.48

3.79

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Michigan avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.04	4.32	3.95	top 15% in Michigan; top 13% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	1.65	0.84	0.69	top 4% in Michigan; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.48	3.79	3.50	top 14% in Michigan; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	1.01	0.49	0.48	top 6% in Michigan; top 6% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	40.3	44.1	45.8	top 38% in Michigan; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	10.7	39.2	42.9	top 6% in Michigan; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.43, RN 1.45, weekend 3.94.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.43 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bronson Commons. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Bronson Health Care Group INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	07/01/2011
Allen, Richard	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2017
Arnan, Martinson	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2019
Arnan, Martinson	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2019
Bronson Health Care Group INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/31/2016
Chen-Zhang, Lynn	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2022
Colegrove, Leigh	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/11/2021
Colegrove, Leigh	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/11/2021
Coleman, Genevieve	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
East, Rebecca	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2015
East, Rebecca	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2015
Falahee, James	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2014
Falahee, James	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/1987
Gibson, Scott	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/28/2012
Goel, Ashutosh	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/21/2025
Goel, Ashutosh	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/21/2025
Gonzalez, Jorge	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2018
Hermsen, Katharine	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
Hoffman, Kellie	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2025
Hunt, Brenda	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/2011

Showing 20 of 45 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 25 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
"Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 45 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Medilodge of Kalamazoo	6.7 mi	Kalamazoo, MI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Friendship Village	8.2 mi	Kalamazoo, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Medilodge of Westwood	8.6 mi	Kalamazoo, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Medilodge of Portage	10.2 mi	Portage, MI	★★★☆☆	2/5
Harold and Grace Upjohn Community Care Center	10.9 mi	Kalamazoo, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Alamo Cove Rehab and Nursing Center	11.0 mi	Kalamazoo, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Villa at Borgess Place	13.3 mi	Kalamazoo, MI	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Life Care Center of Plainwell	15.5 mi	Plainwell, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Plainwell Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Communi	16.4 mi	Plainwell, MI	★★☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
The Laurels of Galesburg	18.4 mi	Galesburg, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
The Orchards at Three Rivers	18.5 mi	Three Rivers, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Ely Manor	19.6 mi	Allegan, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Van Buren, MI — 2 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

South Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation Community — South Haven, MI · overall 2/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Mattawan →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235434.