Brighton Place Spring Valley

Name: Brighton Place Spring Valley
Address: 9009 CAMPO ROAD, Spring Valley, CA, 91977, US
Telephone: 6194602711

9009 Campo Road, Spring Valley, CA 91977 · San Diego County · 68 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Mar 7, 1967

Part of chain: PACIFIC HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (15 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.06

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 15, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jun 15, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Aug 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 8, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
May 8, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Oct 16, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Aug 30, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
May 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop, carry out, or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Apr 17, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 13, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 13, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2021	9	E
2023	1	D
2024	12	F
2025	12	E
2026	2	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.06	4.31	3.95	bottom 1% in California; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.35	0.61	0.69	bottom 20% in California; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.73	3.90	3.50	bottom 1% in California; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.30	0.51	0.48	bottom 33% in California; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	36.7	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.47, weekend 3.65. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Katz Healthcare Investment Partnership	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	5%	11/10/2006
Pacific Healthcare Holdings, INC.	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	80%	11/10/2006
Bruce, Trevor	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2023
Bruce, Trevor	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/29/2023
Eretz BSV Properties LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/04/2008
Kabakibi, Ahmad	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2022
Kabakibi, Ahmad	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	09/01/2022
Rechnitz, Shlomo	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	11/10/2006
Rechnitz, Shlomo	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/10/2006
Rechnitz, Shlomo	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/10/2006
Rockport Administrative Services, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/01/2006
Rockport Administrative Services, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/11/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
"Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Amaya Springs Health Care Center	1.1 mi	Spring Valley, CA	★★★☆☆	4/5
Lemon Grove Care and Rehabilitation Center	1.2 mi	Lemon Grove, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Community Care Center	1.4 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Grossmont Hospital D/P SNF	2.0 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Bella Vista Health Center	2.1 mi	Lemon Grove, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Grossmont Post Acute Care	2.1 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Grossmont Gardens Healthcare Center	2.2 mi	La Mesa, CA		—/5
Parkway Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation	2.3 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Arbor Hills Nursing Center	2.3 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★★★	4/5
La Mesa Healthcare Center	2.4 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Country Manor la Mesa Healthcare Center	2.8 mi	La Mesa, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
San Diego Post-Acute Center	3.0 mi	El Cajon, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Spring Valley →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055685.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Brighton Place Spring Valley

9009 Campo Road, Spring Valley, CA 91977 · 6194602711

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
☐ "Who on your staff manages IV therapy, and what training and monitoring is in place?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 055685 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)