How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1 Bishop Gadsden Way, Charleston, SC 29412 (opens Google Maps) · Charleston County · (843) 762-3300· 41 certified beds · avg 26 residents/day · certified since Feb 19, 2018 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Feb 17, 2022 · F-0880
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 21, 2022 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Apr 25, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not designate a physician to serve as medical director — the doctor responsible for overseeing resident care policies and coordinating medical care across the facility. · F-0841 |
| Feb 17, 2022 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 17, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Feb 17, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 17, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (3 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | South Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.04 | 4.08 | 3.95 | top 6% in South Carolina; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.39 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 6% in South Carolina; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.44 | 3.55 | 3.50 | top 4% in South Carolina; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.05 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 5% in South Carolina; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.9 | 45.9 | 45.8 | top 19% in South Carolina; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 42.1 | 42.9 | top 25% in South Carolina; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.37, RN 1.24, weekend 4.84.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.37 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adams, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Adams, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Baldwin, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Baldwin, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Carter, Heyward | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2017 |
| Carter, Heyward | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Cook, Jonna | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Cook, Jonna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Hill, Joanne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Hill, Joanne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Hussain, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2015 |
| Hussain, Brian | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Jones, Greg | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Jones, Greg | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kelley, Melinda | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kelley, Melinda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kelly, Patrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Kelly, Patrick | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kerrison, Lynne L | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Kerrison, Lynne L | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
Showing 20 of 32 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 12 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kempton of Charleston | 4.0 mi | Charleston, SC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Ashley River Healthcare | 4.9 mi | Charleston, SC | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| NHC Healthcare - Charleston | 6.6 mi | Charleston, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Johns Island Post Acute | 6.6 mi | Johns Island, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Sandpiper Post Acute | 8.3 mi | Mount Pleasant, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Riverside Health and Rehab | 8.6 mi | Charleston, SC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oak Harbor Healthcare | 8.8 mi | Mt Pleasant, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Retreat at Wellmore of Daniel Island | 10.1 mi | Charleston, SC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Franke Health Care Center | 10.9 mi | Mount Pleasant, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 15.0 mi | Charleston, SC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| White Oak Manor - Charleston | 17.5 mi | Charleston, SC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Charleston | 17.6 mi | N Charleston, SC | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425411.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details