KentuckyBarbourville

Barbourville Health and Rehabilitation Center

65 Minton Hickory Farm Road, Barbourville, KY 40906 · Knox County · 135 certified beds · avg 111 residents/day · certified since Aug 28, 1981

Part of chain: SEKY HOLDING CO. (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
7
Serious findings on record
$87,077
Fines, last 3 years
3.73
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Sep 30, 2024 · F-0657 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.

Why it matters: Delays or gaps in care planning mean staff may work without a clear, current roadmap for the resident's daily care and treatment.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Sep 30, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Sep 30, 2024 · F-0835

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Sep 30, 2024 · F-0865 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.

Why it matters: Without a real quality improvement process, the same care problems tend to repeat instead of getting fixed.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Nov 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 28, 2019 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 2, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 28, 2019 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 2, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 28, 2019 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 2, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 28, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 30, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Sep 30, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jun 28, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 28, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 28, 2019▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 28, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201963G ▲
202484H ▲
202550F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $87,077, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 30, 2024Fine$87,077
Sep 30, 2024Payment Denial10 days from Oct 29, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKentucky avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.733.713.95top 34% in Kentucky; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.940.740.69top 17% in Kentucky; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.313.273.50top 30% in Kentucky; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.710.530.48top 18% in Kentucky; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.646.445.8bottom 21% in Kentucky; bottom 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.541.842.9bottom 26% in Kentucky; bottom 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.73, RN 0.94, weekend 3.31. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
FCLTC Holdings INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest04/28/2016
Forcht, TerryIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest06/18/2003
Seky Holding CoOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/13/2003
Alsip, RogerIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2018
Alsip, RogerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Carter, RichardIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2019
Dailey, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2018
Jarboe, MichelleIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Sizemore, HannahIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Sizemore, HannahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/09/2021
Tipton, WesleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2016
Tipton, WesleyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/16/2018
Willis, JackieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Witt, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/06/2018
Witt, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Christian Health Center Corbin12.0 miCorbin, KY★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Corbin Health and Rehabilitation Center12.9 miCorbin, KY★☆☆☆☆2/5
The Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility13.0 miCorbin, KY★★★★★4/5
Mountain View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center13.3 miPineville, KY★★★★☆3/5
Hillcrest Health and Rehabilitation Center13.4 miCorbin, KY★★★☆☆4/5
Williamsburg Health & Rehabilitation Center17.8 miWilliamsburg, KY★★★☆☆3/5
Middlesboro Nursing and Rehabilitation Facility19.1 miMiddlesboro, KY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Barbourville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 185164.