Baker-Katz Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr

194 Boardman Street, Haverhill, MA 01830 (opens Google Maps) · Essex County · (978) 373-5697· 77 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 21, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.78

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

May 21, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
May 21, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. F-0695
May 21, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761

View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580
Nov 20, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658
Jun 5, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jun 5, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · F-0552
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Apr 25, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	9	D
2024	4	D
2025	4	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityMassachusetts averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.78

3.89

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.45

0.65

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

3.59

3.51

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Massachusetts avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.78	3.89	3.95	top 46% in Massachusetts; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.45	0.65	0.69	bottom 21% in Massachusetts; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.59	3.51	3.50	top 35% in Massachusetts; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.37	0.46	0.48	bottom 39% in Massachusetts; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	42.6	38.2	45.8	bottom 32% in Massachusetts; top 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	57.1	42.6	42.9	bottom 23% in Massachusetts; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.58, RN 0.42, weekend 3.40.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.58 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Baker-Katz Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Blake, Mark	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Khan, Amir	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Qureshi, Tariq	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Blake, Mark	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Blake, Mark	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Khan, Amir	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Khan, Amir	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Qureshi, Tariq	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018
Qureshi, Tariq	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2018

All 9 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 62 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Penacook Place, INC	0.7 mi	Haverhill, MA	★★★★☆	4/5
Lakeview House SKLD Nrsg and Residential Care Fac	1.8 mi	Haverhill, MA	★★★★☆	4/5
Oxford Rehabilitation & Health Care Center	2.1 mi	Haverhill, MA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare Center	2.4 mi	Haverhill, MA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Haverhill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	2.7 mi	Haverhill, MA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Whittier Bradford Transitional Care Unit	3.0 mi	Bradford, MA	★★★★★	5/5
Meadows, the	5.5 mi	North Andover, MA	★★★★★	5/5
Prescott House	5.5 mi	North Andover, MA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center	6.0 mi	Methuen, MA	★★★★★	5/5
M I Nursing & Restorative Center	6.7 mi	Lawrence, MA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Nevins Nursing & Rehabilitation Center	6.8 mi	Methuen, MA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Royal Wood Mill Center	7.7 mi	Lawrence, MA	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Essex, MA — 45 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr — Beverly, MA · overall 1/5
Brentwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr (the) — Danvers, MA · overall 4/5
Care One at Essex Park — Beverly, MA · overall 4/5
Care One at Peabody — Peabody, MA · overall 5/5
Chestnut Woods Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr — Saugus, MA · overall 4/5
Continuing Care at Brooksby Village — Peabody, MA · overall 4/5
Devereux Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Marblehead, MA · overall 4/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Haverhill →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225743.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Baker-Katz Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr

194 Boardman Street, Haverhill, MA 01830 · (978) 373-5697

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 43% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 225743 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)