211 E Jasper St, Jacksboro, TX 76458 (opens Google Maps) · Jack County · (940) 567-2686· 104 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Apr 20, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, pattern · Aug 26, 2023 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (H): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jun 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Jan 15, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Jan 15, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 15, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Dec 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | ▲ H · Actual harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Aug 26, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 1 | H ▲ |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 6 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $23,813.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2023 | Fine | $23,813 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.82 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 20% in Texas; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.23 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.48 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 17% in Texas; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.1 | 55.3 | 45.8 | bottom 39% in Texas; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 54.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.21, weekend 3.21.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.53 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Avir at Jacksboro. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack County Hospital District | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/30/2014 |
| 211 E Jasper Street Opco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| 211 E Jasper Street Opco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2025 |
| 211 E Jasper Street Property Owner LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| 211 E Jasper Street Property Owner LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Beaman, Frank | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2014 |
| Beaman, Frank | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2008 |
| Brittain, Jacey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2023 |
| Brittain, Jacey | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2023 |
| Jacksboro Nursing Operations, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Jamal, Syed | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Jamal, Syed | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Lee, Kim | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| THCM, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Welltower INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Welltower INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Welltower NNN Group, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Welltower NNN Group, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Welltower Op, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Avir Health Group — 116 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 115 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeport Medical Lodge | 23.4 mi | Bridgeport, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Graham Oaks Care Center | 25.5 mi | Graham, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Avir at Graham | 26.1 mi | Graham, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Advanced Rehabilitation and Healthcare of Bowie | 28.4 mi | Bowie, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Palo Pinto Nursing Center | 29.0 mi | Mineral Wells, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mineral Wells Nursing & Rehabilitation | 29.2 mi | Mineral Wells, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Decatur Medical Lodge | 32.4 mi | Decatur, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Place of Decatur | 32.7 mi | Decatur, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Springtown Park Rehabilitation and Care Center | 32.9 mi | Springtown, TX | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation | 33.0 mi | Decatur, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avir at Weatherford | 36.9 mi | Weatherford, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Olney Rehabilitation and Care Center | 37.0 mi | Olney, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455808.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details