Avir at Arden Wood

8810 Long Point Dr, Houston, TX 77055 (opens Google Maps) · Harris County · (713) 468-7833· 174 certified beds · avg 134 residents/day · certified since May 5, 1999 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

SFF Candidate

What Special Focus status means →

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 22, 2026

Serious findings on record

most recent May 22, 2026

$130,388

Fines, last 3 years

3.03

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy) — showing 10 of 12

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Feb 19, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Feb 19, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Corrected: Feb 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Feb 19, 2024 · F-0657 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.

Why it matters: Delays or gaps in care planning mean staff may work without a clear, current roadmap for the resident's daily care and treatment.

Corrected: Feb 20, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 1, 2024 · F-0584 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.

Why it matters: An unsafe or unclean environment affects residents' health, comfort, and dignity every single day.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Dec 23, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Dec 23, 2023 · F-0880 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Why it matters: Weak infection control lets illnesses like flu, COVID-19, and drug-resistant infections spread quickly among vulnerable residents.

Corrected: Feb 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · Dec 23, 2023 · F-0882 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.

Why it matters: Without a trained person in charge, infections are more likely to spread unchecked among residents.

Corrected: Dec 26, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 23, 2023 · F-0695 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Why it matters: Mistakes in breathing care can quickly become life-threatening for residents who depend on oxygen or equipment.

Corrected: Jan 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 23, 2023 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Corrected: Jan 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 22, 2026 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 32 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

May 22, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
May 22, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
May 22, 2026G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. F-0777

View all 32 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 22, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
May 22, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
May 22, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. · F-0777
May 22, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644
May 22, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
May 22, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
May 22, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
May 22, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 22, 2026	C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Dec 30, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Mar 28, 2025	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Mar 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644
Mar 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710
Mar 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Mar 28, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Feb 19, 2024	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Feb 19, 2024	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Feb 19, 2024	▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint · F-0657
Feb 1, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584
Feb 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677
Feb 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690
Feb 1, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Dec 23, 2023	▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600
Dec 23, 2023	▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880
Dec 23, 2023	▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread	The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint · F-0882
Dec 23, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695
Dec 23, 2023	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726
Dec 23, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint · F-0623
Dec 23, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Dec 23, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Dec 23, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint · F-0925

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2025

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	9	5	L ▲
2024	7	4	K ▲
2025	7	0	F
2026	9	3	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

2 fines totaling $130,388, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 22, 2026	Fine	$22,895
Dec 23, 2023	Fine	$107,493
Dec 23, 2023	Payment Denial	10 days from Feb 10, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityTexas averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

3.03

3.46

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.40

0.44

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

2.67

3.04

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Texas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.03	3.46	3.95	bottom 25% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.40	0.44	0.69	top 46% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.67	3.04	3.50	bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.29	0.34	0.48	bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	25.6	55.3	45.8	top 2% in Texas; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	28.6	54.6	42.9	top 15% in Texas; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.05, RN 0.41, weekend 2.69.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.05 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Avir at Arden Wood. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
700 12th Street Property Owner, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
700 12th Street Property Owner, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
8810 Long Point Road Opco, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
8810 Long Point Road Opco, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/23/2025
Alderete Mundy, Anne	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Dagan, Amitai	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/23/2025
Freund, Nochum	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Goldberger, Abraham	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/23/2025
Patel, Shital	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Patel, Shital	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Thompson, Johnny	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Travitsky, Aaron	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Welltower INC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Welltower INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Security Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025

All 18 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Avir Health Group — 116 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Avir at Azalea Heights — Tyler, TX · overall 2/5
Avir at Baird — Baird, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Bandera — Bandera, TX · overall 1/5
Avir at Bay City — Bay City, TX · overall 2/5
Avir at Beaumont — Beaumont, TX · overall 1/5abuse
Avir at Beeville — Beeville, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Bellville — Bellville, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Belton — Belton, TX · overall 1/5

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 115 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Texas midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 18 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"CMS lists this facility under its Special Focus program — what is being done differently, and by when?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 79 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Memorial City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	1.1 mi	Houston, TX	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
The Vosswood Nursing Center	3.0 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	5/5
Ffiii Houston SNF Tenant LLC	4.3 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	3/5
Treemont Health Care Center	4.5 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★☆	3/5
Woodway Nursing & Rehab	4.6 mi	Houston, TX		—/5	SFF
The Hallmark	4.7 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★★	5/5
Houston Heights Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	5.0 mi	Houston, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Brookdale Galleria	5.3 mi	Houston, TX	★★★☆☆	2/5
Paradigm at Woodwind Lakes	5.5 mi	Houston, TX		—/5	SFF
Sharpview Residence and Rehabilitation Center	6.3 mi	Houston, TX	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
West Janisch Health Care Center	6.3 mi	Houston, TX	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Clarewood House Extended Care Center	6.5 mi	Houston, TX	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Harris, TX — 97 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Avir at Courtyard — Houston, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Golfcrest — Houston, TX · overall 2/5
Avir at Houston — Houston, TX · overall 1/5
Avir at Orem — Houston, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Pasadena — Pasadena, TX · overall 4/5
Avir at Veterans Memorial — Houston, TX · overall 1/5abuse
Bay Ridge Healthcare Center — La Porte, TX · overall 1/5
Bayou Manor — Houston, TX · overall 5/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Houston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675789.

Avir at Arden Wood

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy) — showing 10 of 12

Inspection findings in the public record

Inspection trend by year

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Costs & payment

Before you compare prices

Who owns this facility

Other facilities in the same chain

Questions to ask on your visit

Also worth asking anywhere

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 79 within 20 miles)

Other facilities in the same county

Viewed & saved homes

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Help us understand what works