South DakotaAberdeen

Avera Mother Joseph Manor Retirement Community

1002 North Jay Street, Aberdeen, SD 57401 · Brown County · 81 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since May 11, 1990

Part of chain: AVERA HEALTH (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$8,824
Fines, last 3 years
4.85
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 28, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 31, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 23, 2023 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 23, 2023 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 21, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 17, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 17, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Dec 17, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Dec 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint
Jun 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 16, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Aug 2, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Mar 23, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 23, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 23, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202372G ▲
202421G ▲
202590F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,824.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 28, 2024Fine$8,824

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.854.323.95top 25% in South Dakota; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.140.910.69top 21% in South Dakota; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.013.713.50top 30% in South Dakota; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.610.510.48top 26% in South Dakota; top 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.748.245.8bottom 26% in South Dakota; bottom 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.834.742.9bottom 28% in South Dakota; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.06, RN 0.96, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Avera HealthOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/1998
Avera HealthOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1998
Bierne, KathleenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Bjerknes, DanielIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/15/2022
Dover, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/23/2023
Fauth, KristenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Fouberg, ErinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025
Franks, ShaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Golz, HeidiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Heinz, BlakeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2024
Henrickson, PaulaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2024
Henrickson, PaulaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2024
Henrickson, PaulaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2026
Herman, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Jensen, PaulaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Kerkvliet, MariettaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2018
Knapp, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Knapp, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Knapp, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2026
Lautt, JulieIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Prairie Heights Healthcare0.5 miAberdeen, SD★★★★☆4/5
Bethesda Home of Aberdeen1.3 miAberdeen, SD★★★☆☆3/5
Aberdeen Health and Rehab1.4 miAberdeen, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avantara Groton18.7 miGroton, SD★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Aberdeen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435042.