South DakotaAberdeen

Bethesda Home of Aberdeen

1224 S High St, Aberdeen, SD 57401 · Brown County · 86 certified beds · avg 82 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1993

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$25,265
Fines, last 3 years
4.46
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 12, 2026 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 10, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 12, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Jul 27, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202440E
202671G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $25,265.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 12, 2026Fine$25,265

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Dakota avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.464.323.95top 36% in South Dakota; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.930.910.69top 43% in South Dakota; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.553.713.50top 48% in South Dakota; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.510.48bottom 46% in South Dakota; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.948.245.8top 26% in South Dakota; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)5.934.742.9top 1% in South Dakota; top 2% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.79, RN 0.79, weekend 3.01. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Akkerman, CharIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2020
Akkerman, CharIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2020
Albl, JudyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Andereson, ZacharyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Andereson, ZacharyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Armbright, LelandIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2019
Bohle, LoriIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/11/1991
Bohle, LoriIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/11/1991
Dangel, DianeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Eisenbeisz, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2019
Eisenbeisz, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2019
Eisenbeisz, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2019
Elsen, TerriIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2014
Langbehn, AnnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Langbehn, AnnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Pence, StaceyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Redmond, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Redmond, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Warrington, DianeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avera Mother Joseph Manor Retirement Community1.3 miAberdeen, SD★☆☆☆☆2/5
Prairie Heights Healthcare1.6 miAberdeen, SD★★★★☆4/5
Aberdeen Health and Rehab2.7 miAberdeen, SD★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avantara Groton17.7 miGroton, SD★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Aberdeen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 435073.