IllinoisChicago

Alden Estates of Northmoor

5831 North Northwest Highway, Chicago, IL 60631 · Cook County · 198 certified beds · avg 181 residents/day · certified since Jul 8, 1996

Part of chain: THE ALDEN NETWORK (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.72
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 18, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 2, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (41)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 4, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jul 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Nov 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 27, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 25, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Oct 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for residents with a colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy — surgical openings in the abdomen that let waste leave the body into a pouch. These require regular, skilled attention to stay clean and healthy. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Sep 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023140F
2024191G ▲
202560F
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIllinois avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.722.993.95top 46% in Illinois; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.630.69bottom 43% in Illinois; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.412.673.50top 48% in Illinois; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.560.48bottom 39% in Illinois; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)34.644.545.8top 24% in Illinois; top 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)32.041.842.9top 35% in Illinois; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.23, RN 0.54, weekend 2.86. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Audra Elisco Grantor Tr Dated 11/02/2004Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest21%03/01/2018
Elisco, ArinIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%07/01/2013
Elisco, CharlesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%07/01/2013
Lauren Magnusson Grantor Tr Dated 11/02/2004Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest21%02/28/2018
Magnusson, GarrettIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%07/01/2013
Magnusson, PaigeIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%07/01/2013
Randi Schullo Grantor Tr Dated 11/02/2004Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest21%02/28/2018
Schullo, JosephIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%07/01/2013
Schullo, NicoleIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest6%07/01/2013
The Alden Group, LTD.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/09/1996
Alden Management Services, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/09/1996
Carl, JoanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2010
Carl, JoanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2010
Marasa, MargoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2011
Midcap Funding IV TrustOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2010
Molitor, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2008
Novak, KatieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE05/18/2015
Schlossberg, FloydIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2010
Schlossberg, FloydIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/10/2010
Schullo, RandiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/16/2010

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Norwood Crossing0.6 miChicago, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Ascension Resurrection Life1.1 miChicago, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Celebrate Senior Living Niles1.5 miNiles, IL★★★★☆4/5
Aperion Care Niles1.7 miNiles, IL★★★★★4/5
Elevate Care North Branch1.8 miNiles, IL★★☆☆☆2/5
Citadel at Saint Benedict1.8 miNiles, IL★★★★☆4/5
Central Baptist Village2.0 miNorridge, IL★★★★★4/5
Norridge Gardens2.1 miNorridge, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Elevate Care Regency2.4 miNiles, IL★★★☆☆3/5
Alden North Shore Rehab & HCC2.5 miSkokie, IL★★★★☆4/5
Community First Medical Center3.1 miChicago, IL★★★★★4/5
Peterson Park Health Care Ctr3.1 miChicago, IL★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chicago →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 145888.