How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
320 North Crawford Street, Willows, CA 95988 (opens Google Maps) · Glenn County · (530) 934-2834· 79 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint F-0567
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. · from a complaint · F-0567 |
| Aug 14, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jul 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Apr 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · F-0745 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 4, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 7, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Apr 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Apr 7, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.03 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in California; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.26 | 0.61 | 0.69 | bottom 6% in California; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.84 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 43% in California; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.51 | 0.48 | bottom 6% in California; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.6 | 36.7 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in California; top 33% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 38.1 | 42.9 | bottom 9% in California; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.77, RN 0.24, weekend 3.59.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.77 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Willows Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bold Quail 3 Operations Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/16/2024 |
| Bold Quail 3, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/16/2024 |
| Newgen LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/16/2024 |
| Robin, Aaron | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/16/2024 |
| Tress, Avrohom | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/16/2024 |
| 320 North Crawford Ave Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| 9560 Pico LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2024 |
| Bold Quail 3 Realty Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/17/2024 |
| Colcol, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2019 |
| Colcol, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2019 |
| Garrison, Jared | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2009 |
| Garrison, Jared | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/03/2009 |
| Newgen LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2024 |
| Pico Ar LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2024 |
| Robin, Aaron | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Robin, Aaron | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2024 |
| Shaw, Pamela | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Shaw, Pamela | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2023 |
| Tress, Avrohom | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Tress, Avrohom | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2024 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Genesis Healthcare — 184 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 183 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colusa Medical Center - SNF | 24.6 mi | Colusa, CA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Chico Terrace Care Center | 24.8 mi | Chico, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oakwood Healthcare Center | 24.8 mi | Chico, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Autumn Creek Post Acute | 24.9 mi | Chico, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Almond View Care Center | 25.8 mi | Williams, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Arbor Post Acute | 26.3 mi | Chico, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| California Park Post Acute | 27.6 mi | Chico, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Gridley Post Acute | 29.8 mi | Gridley, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| River Valley Care Center | 34.5 mi | Live Oak, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Feather River Care Center | 35.7 mi | Oroville, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Oroville Hospital Post-Acute Center | 35.7 mi | Oroville, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Country Crest Post-Acute | 36.8 mi | Oroville, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555151.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details