IndianaIndianapolis

Wildwood Healthcare Center

7301 E 16th St, Indianapolis, IN 46219 · Marion County · 160 certified beds · avg 131 residents/day · certified since May 19, 1989

Part of chain: COMMUNICARE HEALTH (110 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.24
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 23, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 23, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to share a room with their spouse or a roommate of their choosing, or moved residents to a different room without written notice beforehand.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 23, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 14, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023150E
202481G ▲
202520D
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.243.423.95bottom 48% in Indiana; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.260.620.69bottom 2% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.853.013.50bottom 49% in Indiana; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.100.470.48bottom 1% in Indiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.245.945.8top 42% in Indiana; top 45% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)53.840.442.9bottom 27% in Indiana; bottom 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.51, RN 0.28, weekend 3.09. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hancock Regional HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/01/2014
Bond, MariaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Bond, MariaIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Clark, TimothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Clark, TimothyIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Daugherty, JoshuaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Daugherty, JoshuaIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2020
Durham-Boring, TammyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Durham-Boring, TammyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/2025
Felker, DeanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Felker, DeanIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Joyner, SaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Joyner, SaraIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Long, StevenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/14/2018
Long, StevenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2014
Long, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/14/2018
Odenthal, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Omega Healthcare Investors INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Omg in MSTR Lsco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2025
Peak, EthanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/15/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care Center0.5 miIndianapolis, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Harrison Terrace0.6 miIndianapolis, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Arlington Place Health Campus1.3 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★☆3/5
Miller's Merry Manor1.4 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★☆4/5
Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center1.8 miIndianapolis, IN★★☆☆☆1/5
Rosewalk Village2.0 miIndianapolis, IN★★★☆☆3/5
Creekside Health and Rehabilitation Center5.2 miIndianapolis, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Envive of Beech Grove5.3 miBeech Grove, IN★★★☆☆4/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care Center5.6 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★☆3/5
Beech Grove Meadows5.7 miBeech Grove, IN★★★★☆3/5
Fairway Village6.0 miIndianapolis, IN★★★★★5/5
American Village6.3 miIndianapolis, IN★★★☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Indianapolis →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155334.