CaliforniaWhittier

Whittier Nursing and Wellness Center, INC

7926 S Painter Ave, Whittier, CA 90602 · Los Angeles County · 36 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since May 1, 2002

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$13,627
Fines, last 3 years
4.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 19, 2024 · F-0740 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.

Why it matters: A resident's untreated mental health needs can worsen and take a toll on their physical health too.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 4, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Dec 4, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jul 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Dec 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Nov 7, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Sep 19, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have policies on smoking. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 12, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
2024131J ▲
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $13,627, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 19, 2024Fine$13,627
Sep 19, 2024Payment Denial1 days from Oct 18, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.474.313.95top 30% in California; top 24% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.370.610.69bottom 26% in California; bottom 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.503.903.50top 14% in California; top 12% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.310.510.48bottom 38% in California; bottom 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)20.036.745.8top 7% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.16, RN 0.35, weekend 4.19. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bhatia, SonaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%03/01/2023
Bhatia, TaniaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%03/01/2023
SB 2020 Protective TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%03/01/2023
TB 2020 Protective TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%03/01/2023
Bhatia, SonaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Bhatia, SonaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Bhatia, SonaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015
Bhatia, TaniaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Bhatia, TaniaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Great Neck Management INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Whittier Pacific Care Center0.6 miWhittier, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
The Orchard - Post Acute Care1.2 miWhittier, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Presbyterian Intercomm Hosp DP/SNF1.2 miWhittier, CA★★★★★5/5
Whittier Hospital Medical Ctr D/P SNF1.8 miWhittier, CA★★★★★4/5
Socal Post-Acute Care2.4 miWhittier, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Dept of State Hospitals - Metropolitan SNF3.4 miNorwalk, CA★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Whittier Hills Health Care Ctr3.5 miWhittier, CA★★☆☆☆2/5
Imperial Healthcare Center3.5 miLa Mirada, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Pico Rivera Healthcare Center3.5 miPico Rivera, CA★★★★★4/5
Sunny Hills Post Acute3.7 miLa Mirada, CA★★☆☆☆1/5
El Rancho Vista Health Care Center3.8 miPico Rivera, CA★★★★☆3/5
Colonial Gardens Nursing Home4.1 miPico Rivera, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Whittier →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555787.