How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Wecare at Rolling Meadows Rehab and Nursing Ce
107 Curry Road, Waynesburg, PA 15370 (opens Google Maps) · Greene County · (724) 627-3153· 121 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: WECARE CENTERS (13 facilities, chain avg rating 1.9★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 6, 2024
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 23, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 23, 2026 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 23, 2026 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 28, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 23, 2026 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 23, 2026 · F-0607 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Why it matters: Without working prevention policies, mistreatment is more likely to happen and less likely to be caught.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 12, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint F-0604
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint F-0607
The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint F-0801
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Feb 23, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint · F-0801 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · from a complaint · F-0802 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program. · from a complaint · F-0882 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · from a complaint · F-0801 |
| Mar 27, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required. · from a complaint · F-0850 |
| Sep 6, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 6, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better. · F-0944 |
| Jul 18, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Sep 15, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Sep 15, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 10, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 2
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.54
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.47
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.26
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.54 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 46% in Pennsylvania; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.80 | 0.69 | bottom 21% in Pennsylvania; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 47% in Pennsylvania; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.56 | 0.48 | bottom 11% in Pennsylvania; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.2 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 24% in Pennsylvania; top 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.4 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 45% in Pennsylvania; top 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.25, RN 0.43, weekend 2.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.25 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Wecare at Rolling Meadows Rehab and Nursing Ce. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grinspan, Aryeh | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| Kja Rolling Meadows LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| Korn, Eli | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| Rolling Meadows Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/16/2023 |
| Wielgus, Gedaliah | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 03/16/2023 |
| 107 Curry Road LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Bleier, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Bleier, Sorah | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Chadwick, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Chadwick, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Crestview 360 Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Crestview 720 Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Emsir LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/10/2025 |
| Grinspan, Aryeh | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Grinspan, Aryeh | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Grinspan, Aryeh | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Maiden Lane Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| The Schwartz Group Ny LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Walters, Richard | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
| Walters, Richard | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/16/2023 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Wecare Centers — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Wecare at South Hills Rehabilitation and Nrsg Ctr — Canonsburg, PA · overall —/5abuseSFF
- Wecare at Sycamore Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent — Montoursville, PA · overall 1/5
- Foltsbrook Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation — Herkimer, NY · overall 1/5
- Avalon Care Center — New Castle, PA · overall 2/5
- Avalon Springs Care Center — Mercer, PA · overall 4/5
- Burgh Care Center — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 1/5SFF
- Heritage Care Center — Pittsburgh, PA · overall 1/5SFF
- Jameson Nursing and Rehab Center — New Castle, PA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
- "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
- "Do you have a qualified dietician on staff, and how involved are they in each resident's nutrition plan?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
- "Who is your infection preventionist, and what training do they have?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 35% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waynesburg Nursing and Rehab | 1.1 mi | Waynesburg, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Morgantown Heights of Journey | 17.9 mi | Morgantown, WV | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Madison, the | 18.1 mi | Morgantown, WV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sundale Nursing Home | 18.4 mi | Morgantown, WV | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Morgantown Healthcare Center | 18.5 mi | Morgantown, WV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Terrace Health & Rehab Center | 19.5 mi | Uniontown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southmont of Presbyterian Seniorcare | 19.5 mi | Washington, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Lafayette Manor, INC | 19.9 mi | Uniontown, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395624.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).