How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Vineyards at Concord, the
119 West High Street, Frankfort, OH 45628 (opens Google Maps) · Ross County · (740) 998-4779· 32 certified beds · avg 24 residents/day · certified since May 29, 2007 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 28, 2026
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Apr 28, 2026
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.77
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 28, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 28, 2026 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 8, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. F-0725
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. F-0835
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · from a complaint · F-0800 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service. · F-0802 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint · F-0690 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint · F-0692 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Nov 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Apr 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Apr 18, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 23).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 23
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 23 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.77
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.86
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.53
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.77 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 11% in Ohio; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.86 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 10% in Ohio; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.53 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in Ohio; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.70 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 9% in Ohio; top 16% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 26.1 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 4% in Ohio; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 1% in Ohio; top 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.88, RN 0.89, weekend 2.62.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.88 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Vineyards at Concord, the. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burke, Rachel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 02/28/2020 |
| Burke, Rachel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Deer Field Realty Holdings, LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Deer Field Realty Holdings, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Hicks, Joshua | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 02/28/2020 |
| Smith, Robbie | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 02/28/2020 |
| Warner, Tirzah | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 02/28/2020 |
| Warner, Tirzah | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Burke, Rachel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Deer Field Realty Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/2009 |
| Extended Care Specialists, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2025 |
| Hicks Family Trust | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Hicks Family Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Hicks Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/16/2020 |
| Hicks, Joshua | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/2009 |
| Hicks, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/2009 |
| Hicks, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/2009 |
| Juschka, Dirk | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2012 |
| Smith, Robbie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/07/2009 |
| Smith, Robbie | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/02/2008 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Who runs your activities program, what are their qualifications, and can I see this week's activity calendar?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can I see a sample menu, and how do you handle special diets like low-sodium or diabetic meals?"
- "How is your kitchen staffed, and have meals ever been delayed because of staffing?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 26% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 15 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Embassy of Valley View | 2.4 mi | Frankfort, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| National Church Residences Chillicothe | 10.7 mi | Chillicothe, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Westmoreland Place | 11.0 mi | Chillicothe, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 11.3 mi | Greenfield, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hopewell Grove Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 11.7 mi | Chillicothe, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Edgewood Manor of Greenfield | 11.8 mi | Greenfield, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Chillicothe Post Acute | 13.3 mi | Chillicothe, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Court House Manor | 15.9 mi | Washington Court Hou, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cedarvale Commons Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ce | 16.1 mi | Washington Court Hou, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| St Catherines Manor of Washington Court House | 16.3 mi | Washington Court Hou, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Logan Elm Health Care Center | 16.7 mi | Circleville, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Copper Knoll Health & Rehab LLC | 17.1 mi | Washingtn C H, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366360.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).