Copper Knoll Health & Rehab LLC
201 Courthouse Parkway, Washingtn C H, OH 43160 · Fayette County · 75 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jul 15, 2014
Part of chain: TLC MANAGEMENT (20 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (16)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint |
| May 13, 2026 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint |
| Dec 31, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 31, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Dec 31, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Dec 31, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Aug 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Jun 8, 2023 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Apr 29, 2021 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.01 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 26% in Ohio; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Ohio; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.65 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in Ohio; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 15% in Ohio; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.5 | 48.7 | 45.8 | top 3% in Ohio; top 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 11.1 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 5% in Ohio; top 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.93, RN 0.51, weekend 2.57. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Cullen | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2024 |
| Ott, Ryan | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2024 |
| Gibson, Cullen | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2024 |
| Gibson, Cullen | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Juschka, Dirk | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/13/2024 |
| Ott, Dwight | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2024 |
| Ott, Dwight | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Ott, Gary | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2024 |
| Ott, Gary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Ott, Ryan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2024 |
| Ott, Ryan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/12/2024 |
| Patton, Kaleena | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2024 |
| Patton, Kaleena | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/24/2025 |
| Tender Loving Care Management INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2024 |
| Tender Loving Care Management INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/11/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Catherines Manor of Washington Court House | 3.0 mi | Washington Court Hou, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Cedarvale Commons Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ce | 3.1 mi | Washington Court Hou, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Court House Manor | 3.1 mi | Washington Court Hou, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Greenfield Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 12.6 mi | Greenfield, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Edgewood Manor of Greenfield | 13.0 mi | Greenfield, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Embassy of Valley View | 15.4 mi | Frankfort, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Vineyards at Concord, the | 17.1 mi | Frankfort, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Jamestown Place Health and Rehab | 17.2 mi | Jamestown, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Washingtn C H →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 366417.