Via Christi Village Pittsburg
1502 E Centennial, Pittsburg, KS 66762 · Crawford County · 96 certified beds · avg 84 residents/day · certified since Jul 3, 2003
Part of chain: RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · May 6, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: May 6, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 13, 2021 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 27, 2021 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (29)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 6, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Dec 19, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the right treatment and services for residents with dementia or signs of dementia. Dementia care requires specific approaches, training, and patience. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| May 13, 2021 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| May 13, 2021 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| May 13, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| May 13, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 12).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 14 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $13,397.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2024 | Fine | $13,397 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.26 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 43% in Kansas; top 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 19% in Kansas; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.95 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 49% in Kansas; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 4% in Kansas; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 88.8 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 2% in Kansas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 90.9 | 42.0 | 42.9 | bottom 3% in Kansas; bottom 2% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.06, RN 0.48, weekend 3.77. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHNV LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Halberstam, Miriam | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Halberstam, Moshe | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Heartland Recovery LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Kamna Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Kansas Healthcare Holdings 200 LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Mad Family Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Natr Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Rarmna Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Ratr Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Recover-Care SNF Holdings 200 LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| RNR Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Wetr Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| ZM SNF Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Bailey, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Bailey, Amy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/03/2025 |
| Garner, Mindi | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Garner, Mindi | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/26/2025 |
| Kansas Healthcare Holdings 200 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Kfar Habor LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/09/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How are residents and families included in care plan meetings, and how often do those meetings happen?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburg Care and Rehab | 0.0 mi | Pittsburg, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Medicalodges Frontenac | 4.8 mi | Frontenac, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Arma Operator, LLC | 11.1 mi | Arma, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Medicalodges Columbus | 17.5 mi | Columbus, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aspire Senior Living Webb City | 19.6 mi | Webb City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175465.