KansasEmporia

Flint Hills Care and Rehabilitation Center

1620 Wheeler Street, Emporia, KS 66801 · Lyon County · 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1994

Part of chain: RECOVER-CARE HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$22,048
Fines, last 3 years
3.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 1, 2025 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 31, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 27, 2024 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 1, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jul 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes.
Jul 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jul 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jul 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jul 1, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Jun 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 17, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Dec 2, 2021F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Dec 2, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Dec 2, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 2, 2021C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202170F
202380F
202461G ▲
2025101G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $22,048.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jul 1, 2025Fine$22,048

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.314.583.95bottom 11% in Kansas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.550.810.69bottom 25% in Kansas; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.834.053.50bottom 9% in Kansas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.360.490.48bottom 36% in Kansas; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.148.145.8bottom 45% in Kansas; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.042.042.9top 48% in Kansas; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.60, weekend 3.04. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
BHNV 2 LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Goldstein, AvrohomIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Halberstam, MiriamIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Halberstam, MosheIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Kamna Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Kansas SNF Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Mad Family Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Margulies, ZishaIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Midwest SNF Holdings LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2019
MRCMM II LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Natr TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
NZM Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Rarmna Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Ratr TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Recover-Care Healthcare LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
RNR Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Wetr TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Kansas SNF Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Mad Family Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Margulies, ZishaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Emporia Presbyterian Manor0.5 miEmporia, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Chase County Care and Rehab18.1 miCottonwood Falls, KS★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Emporia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175280.