How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
9120 Fathers Legacy, Ellicott City, MD 21042 (opens Google Maps) · Howard County · (410) 696-6700· 16 certified beds · avg 13 residents/day · certified since Apr 18, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. F-0947
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jun 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · F-0947 |
| Sep 2, 2022 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Maryland avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.67 | 3.83 | 3.95 | top 5% in Maryland; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.47 | 0.83 | 0.69 | top 8% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.18 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 4% in Maryland; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.11 | 0.63 | 0.48 | top 7% in Maryland; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.2 | 40.2 | 45.8 | bottom 34% in Maryland; bottom 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 38.7 | 42.9 | top 34% in Maryland; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.75, RN 1.48, weekend 5.24.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.75 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Lutheran Village at Miller's Grant. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Branch, Jeffrey | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2019 |
| Carroll Lutheran Village INC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2016 |
| Branch, Jeffrey | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2019 |
| Branch, Jeffrey | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2019 |
| Friends Services for the Aging | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2018 |
| Friends Services for the Aging | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/12/2025 |
| Lee-Llacer, Reynaldo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/28/2025 |
| Rosenheim, Michelle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/24/2025 |
| Scherr, Nicole | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/28/2021 |
| Scherr, Nicole | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2025 |
| Sodexho INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
| Sodexho INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/28/2025 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellicott City Healthcare Center | 1.7 mi | Ellicott City, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Residences at Vantage Point | 3.3 mi | Columbia, MD | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Encore at Turf Valley | 3.7 mi | Ellicott City, MD | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Summit Park | 5.0 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadow Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 5.2 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| St. Joseph's Nursing Home | 5.6 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Lorien Health Systems - Columbia | 5.6 mi | Columbia, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Catonsville | 5.7 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Forest Haven Nursing and Rehabilitation Ctr | 5.8 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Frederick Villa Healthcare | 6.5 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ridgeway Rehab Center | 6.7 mi | Catonsville, MD | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Future Care Old Court | 6.9 mi | Randallstown, MD | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Howard, MD — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 215363.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details