How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1002 West Main Street, Jefferson City, MO 65109 (opens Google Maps) · Cole County · (573) 636-6288· 60 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Jan 5, 2005 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GREEN TREE HEALTH MANAGEMENT (8 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 3, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint · F-0569 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 22, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.09 | 3.66 | 3.95 | bottom 26% in Missouri; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.69 | top 40% in Missouri; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.61 | 3.22 | 3.50 | bottom 24% in Missouri; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.48 | top 39% in Missouri; bottom 34% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.0 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 21% in Missouri; top 47% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 47.8 | 42.9 | top 22% in Missouri; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.46, weekend 2.55.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.02 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heisinger Bluffs Rehab and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-26 Nationwide Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| 1026 Enterprises II, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Ads Capital Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| HB Operations Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| PC8 Capital Group LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| SJ Family Trust | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| SJ Healthcare Capital LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| 10-26 Nationwide Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| 1026 Enterprises II, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Ads Capital Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Albin, Nicole | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Albin, Nicole | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/04/2025 |
| Drewel, Ashley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Drewel, Ashley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Jeremias, Baruch | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| PC8 Capital Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| SJ Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| SJ Healthcare Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Stern, Aharon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
| Stern, Simon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 21 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 1 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Green Tree Health Management — 8 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heisinger Bluffs Healthcare Western Campus | 0.3 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Stonebridge Villa Marie | 1.0 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Stonebridge Adams Street | 1.4 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Capitol River Wellness & Rehabilitation | 1.6 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Jefferson City Manor Care Center | 2.4 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| River City Living Community | 2.8 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Stonebridge Oak Tree | 2.8 mi | Jefferson City, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Stonebridge Westphalia | 14.1 mi | Westphalia, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Riverview Nursing Center | 17.6 mi | Mokane, MO | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265794.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details