How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
St Lukes Home
242 10th St W, Dickinson, ND 58601 (opens Google Maps) · Stark County · (701) 483-5000· 88 certified beds · avg 86 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1978 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 10, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 9, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
7.39
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 9, 2023 · F-0760
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 9, 2023 · F-0760
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 14, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| Feb 8, 2024 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 9, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 1).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNorth Dakota averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 7.39
North Dakota average: 5.15
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.68
North Dakota average: 1.09
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 6.26
North Dakota average: 4.43
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Dakota avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 7.39 | 5.15 | 3.95 | top 1% in North Dakota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.68 | 1.09 | 0.69 | top 9% in North Dakota; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 6.26 | 4.43 | 3.50 | top 1% in North Dakota; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.48 | top 4% in North Dakota; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 53.6 | 48.8 | 45.8 | bottom 32% in North Dakota; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 36.0 | 40.3 | 42.9 | top 48% in North Dakota; top 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.30, RN 1.43, weekend 5.34.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.30 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St Lukes Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson, Patricia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Anderson, Patricia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Baranko, Darla | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2025 |
| Baranko, Darla | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2025 |
| Fox, Crystal | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2011 |
| Fox, Crystal | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/03/2011 |
| Graves, Amy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2017 |
| Graves, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2017 |
| Healy, Patrick | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/21/2020 |
| Healy, Patrick | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/21/2020 |
| Kouash, Kevin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2025 |
| Kouash, Kevin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/20/2025 |
| Kreidt, Amy | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Kreidt, Amy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Kreidt, Amy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2015 |
| Marsh, Maryanne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2017 |
| Marsh, Maryanne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2017 |
| Murphy, Russell | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Murphy, Russell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2023 |
| Nordsven, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/19/2017 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you coordinate hospice care, and can residents stay here while receiving it?"
- "If you ever planned to discharge or transfer my family member, how much written notice would we receive and how could we appeal?"
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 54% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 27 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Benedicts Health Center | 0.5 mi | Dickinson, ND | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 1 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Stark, ND — 3 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Richardton Health Center INC — Richardton, ND · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 355063.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).