Marycrest Manor

Name: Marycrest Manor
Address: 10664 ST. JAMES DRIVE, Culver City, CA, 90230, US
Telephone: 3108382778

10664 St. James Drive, Culver City, CA 90230 · Los Angeles County · 57 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.64

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 9, 2026	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 9, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 9, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Jan 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 9, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 16, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 16, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Feb 23, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
Feb 23, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 23, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 23, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2024	6	E
2025	5	E
2026	8	F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.64	4.31	3.95	top 7% in California; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.52	0.61	0.69	top 44% in California; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.04	3.90	3.50	top 6% in California; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.39	0.51	0.48	top 46% in California; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	20.8	36.7	45.8	top 8% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.12, RN 0.47, weekend 4.57. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Batres, Gabriela	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2024
Batres, Gabriela	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2024
Batres, Gabriela	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2024
Batres, Gabriela	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2024
Bologna, Jerry	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2003
Bologna, Jerry	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/15/2003
Calderon, Ana	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/05/2003
Calderon, Ana	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/05/2003
Dean-Blanton, Debra	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/12/1999
Dean-Blanton, Debra	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/12/1999
Jimenez, Donald	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/09/2023
Jimenez, Donald	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/09/2023
Larenas, Angelica	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/19/2014
Larenas, Angelica	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/19/2014
Li, Jingyi	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/03/2006
Li, Jingyi	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/03/2006
Maldonado, Veronica	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	12/07/2020
Maldonado, Veronica	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/07/2020
Maldonado, Veronica	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/07/2020
Maldonado, Veronica	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/07/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
"Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
"How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Marina Pointe Healthcare & Subacute	1.1 mi	Culver City, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Southern California Hosp at Culver City D/P SNF	2.0 mi	Culver City, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Vista Del Sol Care Center	2.3 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Meadowbrook Behavioral Health Center	2.3 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5	abuse
View Park Convalescent Center	2.4 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Overland Terrace Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP	2.4 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Lotus Care Center	2.5 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Primrose Post-Acute	2.5 mi	Inglewood, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Cheviot Hills Post Acute	2.5 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Hyde Park Healthcare Center	2.6 mi	Los Angeles, CA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Culver City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055196.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Marycrest Manor

10664 St. James Drive, Culver City, CA 90230 · 3108382778

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
☐ "How do you make sure resident assessments are completed and submitted to the state on time?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 055196 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)