IdahoBoise

Shaw Mountain of Cascadia

909 Reserve Street, Boise, ID 83712 · Ada County · 108 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1981

Part of chain: CASCADIA HEALTHCARE (46 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,839
Fines, last 3 years
4.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 9, 2024 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint

The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.

Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 30, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Dec 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024111G ▲
2025130F
202660D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,839.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 9, 2024Fine$10,839

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIdaho avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.114.033.95top 28% in Idaho; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.570.870.69bottom 22% in Idaho; bottom 48% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.643.483.50top 24% in Idaho; top 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.560.48bottom 34% in Idaho; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.350.345.8bottom 45% in Idaho; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.441.042.9top 38% in Idaho; top 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.57, weekend 3.61. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cascadia HC Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Cascadia Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Idaho Operations LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Hammond, OwenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Laforte, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Bair, BradenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Bair, BradenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/23/2025
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2015
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2025
Hammond, OwenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Laforte, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Timberline Ctre Tenant LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Timberline Ctre Tenant LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
White Oak Healthcare Finance LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/11/2022
Williams, RyanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2016
Williams, RyanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Idaho State Veterans Home - Boise0.5 miBoise, ID★★☆☆☆1/5
Sunterra Springs Riverview2.0 miBoise, ID★★★★☆3/5
Life Care Center of Boise3.5 miBoise, ID★★★★★4/5
Skyline Transitional Care Center3.8 miBoise, ID★★★★☆4/5
Cascadia of Boise4.0 miBoise, ID★☆☆☆☆2/5
Terraces of Boise, the4.5 miBoise, ID★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Timber Springs Transitional Care4.5 miBoise, ID★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Arbor Valley of Cascadia5.2 miBoise, ID★★★☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of Treasure Valley6.0 miBoise, ID★★★★☆3/5
Aspen Transitional Rehabilitation8.8 miMeridian, ID★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Meridian Meadows Transitional Care9.1 miMeridian, ID★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Creekside Transitional Care and Rehabilitation11.5 miMeridian, ID★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Boise →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 135090.