How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
San Gabriel Valley Medical Ctr D/P SNF
438 W. Las Tunas Drive, San Gabriel, CA 91776 (opens Google Maps) · Los Angeles County · (626) 289-5454· 44 certified beds · avg 37 residents/day · certified since Oct 10, 1986 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: AHMC HEALTHCARE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 27, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.36
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 34 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 34 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Apr 27, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Dec 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint · F-0628 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Apr 28, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (11 → 12).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 12
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 12 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.36
California average: 4.31
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.09
California average: 0.61
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.12
California average: 3.90
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.36 | 4.31 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in California; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.09 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 9% in California; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.12 | 3.90 | 3.50 | bottom 8% in California; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 2.18 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 2% in California; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.0 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 7% in California; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 13.6 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 10% in California; top 7% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.66, RN 2.47, weekend 7.10.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (7.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for San Gabriel Valley Medical Ctr D/P SNF. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmc, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 06/30/2014 |
| Alhambra Hospital Medical Center, LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| American Hospital Investment INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Calmed Investment LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Evergreen Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2022 |
| Huang Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Las Tunas Limited Partnership | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Lin, Joy Yu Chu | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Lin, Matthew | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| San Gabriel Healthcare LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| SGVMC Healthcare Investment LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 99% | 12/22/2007 |
| SGVMC Healthcare LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Universal Capital Investment LP | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 12/22/2007 |
| Wu, Jonathan | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 09/18/2007 |
| Wu, Yi Kun | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 09/18/2007 |
| Caballero, Eilyn | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2022 |
| Chu, Shan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2025 |
| Grim, Andrew | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/28/2014 |
| Khatkar, Tarinder | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2025 |
| Khatkar, Tarinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/06/2025 |
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Ahmc Healthcare — 5 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Ahmc Seton Medical Center — Daly City, CA · overall 1/5
- Alhambra Hospital Med Ctr DP/SNF — Alhambra, CA · overall 4/5
- Greater el Monte Community Hos — El Monte, CA · overall 4/5
- Royal Vista Care Center — San Gabriel, CA · overall 1/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can we tour the whole building today, including resident bathrooms and common areas, not just the lobby?"
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the California midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 20% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 27 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 277 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivy Creek Healthcare & Wellness Centre | 0.0 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Live Oak Rehab Center | 0.2 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Royal Vista Care Center | 0.5 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Broadway Healthcare Center | 0.6 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Alhambra Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 1.0 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Pine Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP | 1.1 mi | San Gabriel, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mission Care Center | 1.4 mi | Rosemead, CA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Atherton Baptist Home | 1.5 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Alhambra Hospital Med Ctr DP/SNF | 1.9 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Heritage Manor | 2.4 mi | Monterey Park, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sunny Village Care Center | 2.5 mi | Alhambra, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Monterey Park Conv Hosp | 2.6 mi | Monterey Park, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Los Angeles, CA — 369 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- San Marino Healthcare Center — San Gabriel, CA · overall 3/5abuse
- Santa Anita Convalescent Hospital — Temple City, CA · overall 1/5SFF
- Santa Clarita Post-Acute Care Center — Newhall, CA · overall 1/5
- Santa Fe Heights Healthcare Center, LLC — Compton, CA · overall 1/5abuse
- Santa Fe Lodge — El Monte, CA · overall 2/5
- Santa Monica Health Care Center — Santa Monica, CA · overall 3/5
- Santa Monica Rehabilitation Center — Santa Monica, CA · overall 1/5abuseSFF
- Seacrest Post-Acute Care Center — San Pedro, CA · overall 1/5abuse
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555237.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).