Ridgewood Living & Rehabilitation Center
1624 Highland Drive, Washington, NC 27889 · Beaufort County · 128 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Nov 23, 1982
Part of chain: CCH HEALTHCARE (33 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 5, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jul 23, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (30)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Sep 5, 2025 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. |
| Jan 17, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · from a complaint |
| Jun 12, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 12, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| May 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| May 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| May 24, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| May 24, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 11).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $10,868.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2025 | Fine | $10,868 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.82 | 4.01 | 3.95 | top 39% in North Carolina; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 42% in North Carolina; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.47 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 36% in North Carolina; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.48 | bottom 32% in North Carolina; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.2 | 49.0 | 45.8 | top 25% in North Carolina; top 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 9.1 | 45.7 | 42.9 | top 4% in North Carolina; top 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.44, weekend 3.15. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-26 Nationwide Tr | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| NCNH Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 96% | 06/01/2016 |
| NCNH J-Dek LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| NCNH J-Dek LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 06/01/2016 |
| Starlight Healthcare LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Starlight Healthcare LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 36% | 06/01/2016 |
| 10-26 Nationwide Tr | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| CCH Healthcare LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| CCH Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Forbright Bank | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Forbright Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/11/2026 |
| Hartley, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Hartley, Lisa | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Lewis, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Lewis, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| NCNH J-Dek LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| NCNH Propco Holding LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Ridgewood Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Starlight Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
| Stern, Jacob | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2016 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "How do you handle COVID-19 vaccination for residents and staff, and what happens during an outbreak?"
- "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
- "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| River Trace Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | Washington, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Carrolton of Williamston | 13.2 mi | Williamston, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cypress Glen Retirement Community | 18.6 mi | Greenville, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Washington →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345228.