14041 Cottingham Road, Houston, TX 77048 (opens Google Maps) · Harris County · (346) 293-9600· 120 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Nov 5, 2019 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: TEXVET (9 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, pattern · Jun 23, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (K): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was a pattern: more than a limited occurrence, without being widespread. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 19, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Sep 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 23, 2024 | ▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 23, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Aug 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jun 23, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 1 | K ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $14,730.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2024 | Fine | $14,730 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.01 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 4% in Texas; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.68 | 0.44 | 0.69 | top 10% in Texas; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.45 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 4% in Texas; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.48 | top 16% in Texas; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 33.3 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 9% in Texas; top 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 18.8 | 54.6 | 42.9 | top 6% in Texas; top 12% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.08, RN 0.55, weekend 3.62.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Richard A. Anderson (state of Texas Veterans Land. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - State
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkely, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Fellbaum, Ernest | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Havens, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Johanns, Kathy | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Studer, Stanley | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Stumberg, Eric | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Stumberg, Louis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/08/2019 |
| Touchstone Veterans Management LTD. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2019 |
All 8 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Texvet — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terra Bella Health and Wellness Suites | 2.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Tuscany Village | 3.8 mi | Pearland, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Colonnades at Reflection Bay | 4.1 mi | Pearland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Thrive Rehabilitation of Pearland | 4.3 mi | Pearland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oasis at Pearland | 5.0 mi | Pearland, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avir at Courtyard | 5.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Avir at Golfcrest | 5.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avir at Orem | 5.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.3 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Harmony Care at Golfcrest | 6.4 mi | Houston, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Holly Hall | 6.6 mi | Houston, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Garden Terrace Healthcare Center of Houston | 6.7 mi | Houston, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Harris, TX — 97 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676479.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details