South CarolinaSaint Stephen

Lake Moultrie Nursing Home

1038 McGill Lane, Saint Stephen, SC 29479 · Berkeley County · 88 certified beds · avg 83 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1995

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$11,196
Fines, last 3 years
4.08
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jan 22, 2025 · F-0578

The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.

Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 23, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 6, 2023 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 2, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (9)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 22, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 6, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202351G ▲
202531J ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $11,196.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 22, 2025Fine$11,196

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.084.083.95top 41% in South Carolina; top 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.810.670.69top 21% in South Carolina; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.593.553.50top 38% in South Carolina; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.620.410.48top 15% in South Carolina; top 21% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)28.445.945.8top 8% in South Carolina; top 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.142.142.9top 17% in South Carolina; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.71, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Government - Hospital district

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Clarendon Memorial HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest09/30/2005
Browder, ChristinaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2016
Matthews, RobinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2016
Matthews, RobinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/12/2016
Stanley, MathewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/06/2019
Stanley, MathewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/06/2019

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pruitthealth- Moncks Corner15.5 miMoncks Corner, SC★★☆☆☆2/5
Carlyle Senior Care of Kingstree19.1 miKingstree, SC★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Saint Stephen →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425341.