MichiganHolland

Resthaven Care Center

280 W 40th St, Holland, MI 49423 · Allegan County · 145 certified beds · avg 138 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1980

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.96
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Aug 5, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Aug 19, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 5, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Jun 25, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jun 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jun 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jun 6, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 26, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 26, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202370F
2024110F
2025111G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 25, 2025Payment Denial5 days from Aug 29, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMichigan avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.964.323.95top 17% in Michigan; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.630.840.69bottom 33% in Michigan; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.153.793.50top 22% in Michigan; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.490.48bottom 19% in Michigan; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.544.145.8top 24% in Michigan; top 25% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)23.539.242.9top 21% in Michigan; top 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.33, RN 0.55, weekend 3.61. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Baumann, NathanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2019
Bryhn, NinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2024
Bryhn, NinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2025
Bucher, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2023
Bucher, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2025
Carlson, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/16/2020
Hofmeyer, TerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2024
Kleinheksel, BarbaraIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2020
Lutz, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2021
Martin, SamuelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/27/2015
Mulder, PhilipIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2019
Old National BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2022
Riekse, TomIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/20/2024
Schuckert, DeedreIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2018
Schuckert, DeedreIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2018
Schuckert, DeedreIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2018
Sterken, AnnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2019
Vanderklok, KevinIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/28/2021
Vanputten, PamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Inn at Freedom Village2.4 miHolland, MI★★★★★5/5
Medilodge of Holland3.6 miHolland, MI★★★★☆4/5
Medilodge of Zeeland6.5 miZeeland, MI★★★☆☆3/5
Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Community6.6 miZeeland, MI★★★★☆4/5
The Orchards at Douglas Cove9.7 miDouglas, MI★★☆☆☆2/5
The Oaks at Jamestown14.4 miHudsonville, MI★★★★★5/5
The Laurels of Hudsonville14.7 miHudsonville, MI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Allendale Nursing and Rehabilitation Community18.0 miAllendale, MI★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Holland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235378.