CaliforniaIrvine

Regents Point - Windcrest

19191 Harvard Avenue, Irvine, CA 92612 · Orange County · 59 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Feb 4, 1988

Part of chain: HUMANGOOD (17 facilities, chain avg rating 4.5★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.96
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (38)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 10, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Jun 10, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 15, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
May 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 15, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
May 15, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 22, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 3, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Dec 14, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (14 → 16).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
202460D
2025140E
2026160E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.964.313.95top 16% in California; top 14% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.950.610.69top 12% in California; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.563.903.50top 12% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.800.510.48top 11% in California; top 11% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)30.836.745.8top 32% in California; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9top 1% in California; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.99, RN 0.96, weekend 4.59. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
HumangoodOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest05/01/2016
Humangood SocalOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/02/1988
Baker Tilly Advisory Group LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/21/2025
Baker Tilly Us LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/15/2024
Baker, JudithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/25/2012
Baker, JudithIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Battison, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/03/2011
Battison, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Brown, HermanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2016
Brown, HermanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/10/2013
Chang, AlvinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2008
Chang, AlvinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2008
Christopherson, JoanneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Christopherson, JoanneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/20/2025
Cochrane, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2009
Cochrane, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2009
Duran, AnnaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/18/2024
Duran, AnnaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/18/2024
Feller, IreneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/12/2021
Feller, IreneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/26/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Newport Subacute Healthcare Center4.1 miCosta Mesa, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Victoria Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center4.6 miCosta Mesa, CA★★★★★5/5
Plaza Healthcare Center4.9 miSanta Ana, CA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
South Coast Post Acute5.3 miSanta Ana, CA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
South Coast Global Medical Center D/P SNF5.4 miSanta Ana, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Foothill Regional Medical Center D/P SNF5.5 miTustin, CA★★★★☆4/5
Mesa Verde Post Acute Care Center5.8 miCosta Mesa, CA★★★★☆3/5
Newport Nursing and Rehabilitation Center5.9 miNewport Beach, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Pelican Ridge Post Acute6.0 miNewport Beach, CA★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Crystal Cove Care Center6.0 miNewport Beach, CA★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Irvine →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555295.