WashingtonSeattle

Queen Anne Healthcare

2717 Dexter Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 · King County · 120 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1976

Part of chain: AVAMERE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.61
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Feb 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
May 16, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · from a complaint
Mar 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 8).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110E
202420D
202590D
202680D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWashington avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.614.243.95top 19% in Washington; top 20% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.350.910.69top 9% in Washington; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.063.693.50top 18% in Washington; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.180.670.48top 5% in Washington; top 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.245.145.8top 32% in Washington; top 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)21.745.442.9top 7% in Washington; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.84, RN 1.42, weekend 4.26. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ari Operations, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Ariso LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Avamere Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Karl Rickard Miller Jr Revocable TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Miller, KarlIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Adams, NancyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Adams, NancyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
Avamere Health Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Avamere Health Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2025
Avamere Skilled Advisors LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Avamere Skilled Advisors LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2025
Cavallo, GlenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Doss, ErinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/07/2018
Doss, ErinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2025
Fanunal, LorielIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2023
Fanunal, LorielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2023
Feakin, CodyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2025
Feakin, CodyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Fowler, KatherineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025
Fowler, KatherineIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Columbia Lutheran Home1.3 miSeattle, WA★★★★☆3/5
Mirabella2.0 miSeattle, WA★★★★★3/5
Bailey-Boushay House2.8 miSeattle, WA★★★☆☆3/5
The Terraces at Skyline2.8 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
Seattle Medical Post Acute Care3.2 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Park Shore3.3 miSeattle, WA★★★★☆3/5
Ballard Center3.8 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
Transitional Care of Seattle4.1 miSeattle, WA★★★★☆3/5
Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West4.3 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
Cascades of St Anne5.2 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
The Broadview Center5.5 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆1/5
Washington Care Center5.5 miSeattle, WA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Seattle →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505204.