Pink Bud Home for the Golden Years

400 So Coker, Greenwood, AR 72936 (opens Google Maps) · Sebastian County · (479) 996-4125· 110 certified beds · avg 60 residents/day · certified since Jan 28, 2014 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

SFF Candidate

What Special Focus status means →

1/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected May 22, 2025

Serious findings on record

most recent May 22, 2025

$28,561

Fines, last 3 years

6.31

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · May 22, 2025 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (L): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was widespread: a systemic or pervasive problem. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, widespread · May 22, 2025 · F-0610 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.

Why it matters: When allegations aren't investigated, harm to residents can continue unchecked.

Corrected: Jun 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

May 22, 2025L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
May 22, 2025L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread
The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610
May 22, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761

View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
May 22, 2025	▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
May 22, 2025	▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, widespread	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
May 22, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Feb 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Feb 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Feb 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Feb 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 9, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 9, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921
Nov 17, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Nov 17, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Nov 17, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2022

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2022	3	0	D
2024	7	0	E
2025	7	2	L ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $28,561.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 22, 2025	Fine	$28,561

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityArkansas averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

6.31

4.71

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.42

0.48

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

5.17

4.04

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	Arkansas avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	6.31	4.71	3.95	top 4% in Arkansas; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.42	0.48	0.69	bottom 42% in Arkansas; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.17	4.04	3.50	top 7% in Arkansas; top 5% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.21	0.28	0.48	bottom 34% in Arkansas; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	48.2	49.5	45.8	top 50% in Arkansas; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	20.0	44.8	42.9	top 14% in Arkansas; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.81, RN 0.32, weekend 3.94.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.81 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Pink Bud Home for the Golden Years. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Corbin, Roger	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Corbin, Sheila	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	08/20/1982
Errs, INC.	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	08/02/1982
Oliver, Rhonda	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	08/20/1982
Oliver, Rhonda	Individual	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Wilson, Evelyn	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Ballew, Tracy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2025
Ballew, Tracy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2025
Corbin, Roger	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Corbin, Roger	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Corbin, Sheila	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Corbin, Sheila	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2025
Corbin, Sheila	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Craft, Charles	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2025
Oliver, Rhonda	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Oliver, Rhonda	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Wilson, Evelyn	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Wilson, Evelyn	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982
Wilson, Evelyn	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/1982

All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 48% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"CMS lists this facility under its Special Focus program — what is being done differently, and by when?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 17 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Ashton Place Health and Rehab, LLC	8.1 mi	Barling, AR	★★★★☆	4/5
Brooken Hill Health and Rehab, LLC	9.1 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★★★☆☆	3/5
Fianna Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	10.1 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★★★☆☆	3/5
Methodist Health and Rehab	11.2 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★★★☆☆	3/5
Covington Court Health and Rehabilitation Center	11.3 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★★★★☆	4/5
Pocola Health and Rehab	11.9 mi	Pocola, OK	★☆☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
The Blossoms at Fort Smith Rehab & Nursing Center	12.3 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Chapel Ridge Health and Rehab	12.4 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★★★★☆	3/5
Riverside Health Services	13.5 mi	Arkoma, OK	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Legacy Health and Rehabilitation Center	14.8 mi	Fort Smith, AR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Greenhurst Nursing Center	15.0 mi	Charleston, AR	★★★★★	5/5
The Blossoms at Van Buren Rehab and Nursing Center	15.7 mi	Van Buren, AR	★☆☆☆☆	1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Greenwood →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 045456.