How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
704 S Ash Street, Hillsboro, KS 67063 (opens Google Maps) · Marion County · (620) 947-1429· 45 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Apr 5, 2005 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 13, 2022 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 15, 2022 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Dec 13, 2022 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 13, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 8).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.64 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 43% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in Kansas; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.14 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 41% in Kansas; top 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.20 | 0.49 | 0.48 | bottom 3% in Kansas; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 62.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 17% in Kansas; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 42.0 | 42.9 | bottom 19% in Kansas; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.29, RN 0.39, weekend 3.82.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.29 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Salem Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Other
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crocker, Heather | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2016 |
| Crocker, Heather | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2016 |
| Donahue, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Ensey, Laura | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/30/2021 |
| Hamm, Jodie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Hamm, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Herbel, Delayne | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/29/2018 |
| Jost, Jared | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/29/2024 |
| Koslowsky, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/16/2018 |
| Lancaster, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/29/2023 |
| Mungai, Peter | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Mungai, Peter | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2016 |
| Mungai, Peter | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2025 |
| Reeh, Michael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Reeh, Michael | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/13/2025 |
| Salem Hospital, INC. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/15/2021 |
| Weber, Virgilene | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Wiebe, Henry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/29/2018 |
| Williams, Angela | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
| Zaragoza, Angie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/20/2024 |
All 20 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parkside Homes | 0.1 mi | Hillsboro, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bethesda Home | 10.1 mi | Goessel, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| St Luke Living Center | 10.6 mi | Marion, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Access Mental Health | 13.1 mi | Peabody, KS | —/5 | SFF | |
| Peabody Health and Rehab | 13.2 mi | Peabody, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Schowalter Villa | 19.1 mi | Hesston, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Moundridge Manor | 19.5 mi | Moundridge, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bethel Health Care Center | 20.0 mi | North Newton, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175484.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details