New YorkNorwich

Norwich Rehabilitation & Nursing Center

88 Calvary Drive, Norwich, NY 13815 · Chenango County · 80 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Jun 16, 1992

Part of chain: PERSONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$63,215
Fines, last 3 years
3.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 3, 2024 · F-0578 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.

Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 5, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Aug 1, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Aug 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 3, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jul 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202110D
202451J ▲
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

7 fines totaling $63,215.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 3, 2024Fine$15,591
Feb 20, 2024Fine$4,938
Feb 12, 2024Fine$4,938
Jan 22, 2024Fine$14,814
Jan 8, 2024Fine$4,938
Jan 2, 2024Fine$4,587
Dec 11, 2023Fine$13,409

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.673.583.95top 38% in New York; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.730.680.69top 29% in New York; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.023.133.50top 48% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.240.480.48bottom 25% in New York; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.440.345.8bottom 12% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)45.039.842.9bottom 34% in New York; bottom 44% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.53, RN 0.70, weekend 2.90. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Barth, AlexanderIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%06/24/2009
Zagelbaum, EphraimIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest49%01/01/2011
Zagelbaum, YechielIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest21%06/24/2009
Amidon, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Amidon, JeffreyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Barth, AlexanderIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Barth, AlexanderIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Norwich Realty Associates LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/25/2025
Revoir, EdithIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Revoir, EdithIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Valley View Manor Nursing Home1.1 miNorwich, NY★★★☆☆3/5
N Y S Veterans Home7.5 miOxford, NY★★★★☆4/5
Chasehealth Rehab and Residential Care11.5 miNew Berlin, NY★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Norwich →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335759.