TexasAbilene

Northern Oaks Living & Rehabilitation Center

2722 Old Anson Rd, Abilene, TX 79603 · Taylor County · 96 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Jul 30, 1991

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.13
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 2, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
May 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
Jan 22, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Aug 29, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 29, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Aug 29, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023150F
202430E
202520E
202690E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.133.463.95bottom 33% in Texas; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.440.69top 35% in Texas; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.773.043.50bottom 36% in Texas; bottom 19% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.340.48top 26% in Texas; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.055.345.8
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.43, weekend 2.67. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Eastland Memorial Hospital DistrictOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2015
Anson Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Burleson, RhondaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2015
Burleson, RhondaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2015
Burleson, RhondaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2015
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Burnam, SoonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Caretrust GP LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Caretrust Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Ctr Partnership LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2000
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2002
Hudman, EugeneIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2013
Hudman, EugeneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2013
Hudman, EugeneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2013
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Northern Oaks Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2015
Northern Oaks Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/12/2025
Taylor, StephenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Avir at Coronado1.1 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Hendrick Skilled Nursing Facility1.1 miAbilene, TX★★★★★5/5
Silver Spring2.7 miAbilene, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Oaks at Radford Hills Healthcare Center2.9 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Willowcreek Rehab and Nursing3.5 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Brightpointe at Lytle Lake3.8 miAbilene, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Wisteria Place5.0 miAbilene, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation7.3 miAbilene, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Wesley Court Health Center7.6 miAbilene, TX★★★★★4/5
Mesa Springs Healthcare Center8.4 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Merkel Nursing Center16.0 miMerkel, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Clyde Nursing Center16.1 miClyde, TX★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Abilene →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455934.