TexasAbilene

Brightpointe at Lytle Lake

1201 Clarks Dr, Abilene, TX 79602 · Taylor County · 120 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since Feb 17, 2017 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: AVIR HEALTH GROUP (116 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$23,733
Fines, last 3 years
2.75
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 29, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 29, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 9, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 9, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 9, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jan 14, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility required residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits or pay privately as a condition of moving in, or failed to tell residents which types of care it does not provide. Both practices are against the rules. · from a complaint
Feb 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Nov 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · from a complaint
Jan 18, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Oct 23, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024130E
202562K ▲
202650F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $23,733.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 29, 2025Fine$23,733

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.753.463.95bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.130.440.69bottom 1% in Texas; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.413.043.50bottom 10% in Texas; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.110.340.48bottom 4% in Texas; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.955.345.8top 33% in Texas; top 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.454.642.9bottom 28% in Texas; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.98, RN 0.14, weekend 2.61. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
1201 Clarks Drive Opco, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
1201 Clarks Drive Opco, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/03/2025
1201 Clarks Drive Property Owner, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
1201 Clarks Drive Property Owner, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Dagan, AmitaiIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2025
Freund, NochumIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Goldberger, AbrahamIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/24/2025
Lane, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Thompson, JohnnyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2024
Travitsky, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower INCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower NNN Group, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025
Welltower Op, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Oaks at Radford Hills Healthcare Center0.9 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Hendrick Skilled Nursing Facility2.6 miAbilene, TX★★★★★5/5
Silver Spring2.7 miAbilene, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Avir at Coronado2.8 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Northern Oaks Living & Rehabilitation Center3.8 miAbilene, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Wisteria Place3.9 miAbilene, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Willowcreek Rehab and Nursing4.6 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation5.0 miAbilene, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Wesley Court Health Center5.4 miAbilene, TX★★★★★4/5
Mesa Springs Healthcare Center6.8 miAbilene, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Clyde Nursing Center13.0 miClyde, TX★★★★★5/5
Merkel Nursing Center18.4 miMerkel, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Abilene →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676416.