North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP

Name: North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP
Address: 668 E. BULLARD, Fresno, CA, 93710, US
Telephone: 5593202200

668 E. Bullard, Fresno, CA 93710 · Fresno County · 99 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1984

Part of chain: CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES (40 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

3.49

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 27, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 13, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 26, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 3, 2022	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 3, 2022	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 3, 2022	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 3, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 3, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 3, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 3, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Feb 3, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 3, 2022	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	9	F
2024	7	E
2025	4	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.49	4.31	3.95	bottom 10% in California; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.61	0.61	0.69	top 32% in California; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.23	3.90	3.50	bottom 12% in California; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.56	0.51	0.48	top 25% in California; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	0.0	36.7	45.8	—
RN turnover (%)	0.0	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.69, weekend 3.68. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Corporate Interface Services LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/18/2024
Corporate Interface Services LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/08/2025
Del Toro, Vivian	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/05/2019
Del Toro, Vivian	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/05/2019
Grossman, Stephen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/04/2018
Grossman, Stephen	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2018
North Point Wellness GP LLC	Organization	General Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2014
North Point-Let LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	07/09/2025
Rechnitz, Shlomo	Individual	Limited Partnership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/01/2014
Rockport Administrative Services, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	10/31/2014
Rockport Administrative Services, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/08/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
"How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
The Terraces at San Joaquin Gardens Village	0.3 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★★★	3/5
Horizon Health & Subacute Center	2.4 mi	Fresno, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Keystone Post-Acute	2.7 mi	Fresno, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Oakwood Gardens Care Center	3.0 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Covenant Post Acute	3.0 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Community Subacute and Transitional Care Center	3.1 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Willow Creek Healthcare Center	3.1 mi	Clovis, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Morning Star Post Acute	3.9 mi	Clovis, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Healthcare Centre of Fresno	5.6 mi	Fresno, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Orchard Post Acute	6.2 mi	Fresno, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Fresno →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555179.

The Care File

Visit checklist — North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP

668 E. Bullard, Fresno, CA 93710 · 5593202200

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
☐ "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555179 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)