How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3003 N Mariposa, Fresno, CA 93703 (opens Google Maps) · Fresno County · (559) 459-1711· 106 certified beds · avg 98 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 13 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. F-0732
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. · F-0800 |
| Dec 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Aug 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | California avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 7.07 | 4.31 | 3.95 | top 2% in California; top 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.35 | 0.61 | 0.69 | top 5% in California; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.89 | 3.90 | 3.50 | top 3% in California; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.16 | 0.51 | 0.48 | top 6% in California; top 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 21.7 | 36.7 | 45.8 | top 10% in California; top 4% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.7 | 38.1 | 42.9 | top 22% in California; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 9.19, RN 1.75, weekend 7.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (9.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Community Subacute and Transitional Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community Hospitals of Central California | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2009 |
| Abundis, Susan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Abundis, Susan | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Abundis, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Abundis, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Baker Tilly Us LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/25/2025 |
| Belliston, Cory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2022 |
| Belliston, Cory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2022 |
| Bennett, Lori | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2022 |
| Bennett, Lori | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2022 |
| Bennett, Lori | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2022 |
| Bennett, Lori | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2022 |
| Boone, Keith | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Boone, Keith | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Boone, Keith | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Boone, Keith | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Bryant, Fatima | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Bryant, Fatima | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Bryant, Fatima | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
| Bryant, Fatima | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 95 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 75 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakwood Gardens Care Center | 0.6 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Covenant Post Acute | 0.6 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Keystone Post-Acute | 0.7 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Healthcare Centre of Fresno | 2.5 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Terraces at San Joaquin Gardens Village | 2.8 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| North Point Healthcare & Wellness Centre LP | 3.1 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Fresno Postacute Care | 3.5 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Orchard Post Acute | 3.6 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sierra Vista Healthcare | 4.0 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Evergreen Care Center | 4.2 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pacific Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Fresno, CA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stonehaven Senior Living | 4.5 mi | Fresno, CA | —/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Fresno, CA — 31 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055258.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details