OklahomaMcAlester

Mitchell Care & Rehab Center

315 West Electric Avenue, McAlester, OK 74501 · Pittsburg County · 100 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 2007

Part of chain: MGM HEALTHCARE (27 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.43
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 27, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 27, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jul 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Nov 30, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202350D
202440E
202550E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.434.583.95bottom 43% in Oklahoma; top 25% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.550.410.69top 18% in Oklahoma; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.844.163.50bottom 31% in Oklahoma; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.280.48top 24% in Oklahoma; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.355.545.8top 32% in Oklahoma; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)62.553.642.9bottom 38% in Oklahoma; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.42, RN 0.55, weekend 3.83. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
JFB Ok TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest50%01/09/2024
Ok SNF Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/09/2024
Ok SNF Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%01/09/2024
Southeast Ventures TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest48%01/09/2024
Friedman, NaftaliIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2024
Hill, ElizabethIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Hills Living & Rehabilitation Center0.5 miMcAlester, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
McAlester Nursing & Rehab1.0 miMcAlester, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
New Hope Retirement & Care Center1.5 miMcAlester, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
Walnut Grove Care & Rehab Center3.5 miMcAlester, OK★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Beare Manor14.5 miHartshorne, OK★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in McAlester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375512.