Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community

100 Holland Glen, Escondido, CA 92026 (opens Google Maps) · San Diego County · (760) 746-2500· 19 certified beds · avg 14 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 2017 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified

Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Feb 13, 2026

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

7.94

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Feb 13, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
Feb 13, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. F-0730
Feb 13, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

View all 17 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 13, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655
Feb 13, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730
Feb 13, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 13, 2026	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 13, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Feb 13, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825
Feb 13, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them. · F-0865
Feb 13, 2026	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867
Oct 31, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 31, 2024	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Oct 31, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Nov 30, 2023	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Nov 30, 2023	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
Nov 30, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Nov 30, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Nov 30, 2023	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Nov 30, 2023	B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2023

2024

2026

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	6	F
2024	3	E
2026	8	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityCalifornia averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

7.94

4.31

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.78

0.61

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

7.36

3.90

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	California avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	7.94	4.31	3.95	top 1% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.78	0.61	0.69	top 18% in California; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	7.36	3.90	3.50	top 1% in California; top 1% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.89	0.51	0.48	top 10% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	30.0	36.7	45.8	top 29% in California; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	—	38.1	42.9	—

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.48, RN 0.74, weekend 6.93.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (7.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Other

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	04/18/2017
Brouwer, Jacob	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/2004
Brouwer, Jacob	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Brouwer, Jacob	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Cooper, Joanne	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/2004
Cooper, Joanne	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Cooper, Joanne	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Denboer, Derkina	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2013
Denboer, Derkina	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Denboer, Derkina	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Francis, Lisa	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	09/21/2015
Francis, Lisa	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2025
Francis, Lisa	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Hoeksema, Larry	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	08/02/2004
Hoeksema, Larry	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Hoeksema, Larry	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Jansma, James	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2013
Jansma, James	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Jansma, James	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/18/2017
Memmelaar, Mark	Individual	Corporate Director	NOT APPLICABLE	05/09/2008

Showing 20 of 28 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 8 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
"How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
"How are therapy services provided here, and how quickly does therapy start after a doctor orders it?"
"How does your quality improvement program work, and can you share a recent example of a problem you found and fixed?"
"How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 26 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Escondido Post Acute	1.8 mi	Escondido, CA	★★★★★	4/5
Palomar Vista Healthcare Center	2.5 mi	Escondido, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Palomar Heights Post Acute	2.6 mi	Escondido, CA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Valley Vista Post Acute	3.0 mi	Escondido, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Redwood Terrace Health Center	3.5 mi	Escondido, CA	★★★★★	5/5
Ocean View Post Acute	4.1 mi	Escondido, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Village Square Healthcare Center	6.6 mi	San Marcos, CA	★★★★☆	4/5
Casa de Las Campanas	7.5 mi	San Diego, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Santa Fe Post-Acute	9.8 mi	Vista, CA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Vista View Post Acute	10.3 mi	Vista, CA	★★★★☆	3/5
Villa Rancho Bernardo Care Center	10.5 mi	San Diego, CA	★★★★★	4/5
The Villas at Poway	11.2 mi	Poway, CA	★★★★★	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in San Diego, CA — 83 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Mission Hills Post Acute Care — San Diego, CA · overall 4/5
Mount Miguel Covenant Village — Spring Valley, CA · overall 3/5
National City Post Acute — National City, CA · overall 3/5
Pacific Villas Post Acute — Oceanside, CA · overall —/5
Paradise Valley Health Care — National City, CA · overall 5/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Escondido →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555906.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Meadowbrook Village Christian Retirement Community

100 Holland Glen, Escondido, CA 92026 · (760) 746-2500

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What does the care plan for a brand-new resident cover in the first 48 hours, and who writes it?"
☐ "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
☐ "How are therapy services provided here, and how quickly does therapy start after a doctor orders it?"
☐ "How does your quality improvement program work, and can you share a recent example of a problem you found and fixed?"
☐ "How does your quality committee work, and can you give an example of a problem it recently identified and fixed?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 30% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 28 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 555906 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)