OklahomaMcLoud

McLoud Nursing Center

701 South 8th Street, McLoud, OK 74851 · Pottawatomie County · 80 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Jun 28, 1998

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jun 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service.
Jun 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jun 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 1, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · from a complaint
May 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 5, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
May 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Feb 20, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 20, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Feb 20, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 15).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202060E
202340E
2024160F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.894.583.95top 32% in Oklahoma; top 15% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.410.69bottom 22% in Oklahoma; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.694.163.50top 21% in Oklahoma; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.130.280.48bottom 8% in Oklahoma; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.355.545.8top 29% in Oklahoma; bottom 41% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.053.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.80, RN 0.21, weekend 3.65. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brogdon, ChristopherIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%09/19/2014
Brogdon, ChristopherIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2014
Brogdon, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2014
Brogdon, ChristopherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/19/2014
Craig, CalebIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Craig, CalebIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Lade, ArvidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Lade, ArvidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2023
Marsh Pointe Management LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2014
Marsh Pointe Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/24/2025
McLoud Property Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2013
McLoud Property Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2013
Nichols, CherylIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2016
Nichols, CherylIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/06/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Harrah Nursing Center6.7 miHarrah, OK★★★★★4/5
The Wolfe Living Center at Summit Ridge9.7 miHarrah, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Shawnee Care Center10.0 miShawnee, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Shawnee Colonial Estates Nursing Home10.6 miShawnee, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Golden Rule Home11.0 miShawnee, OK★★☆☆☆2/5
The Regency Skilled Nursing and Therapy12.7 miShawnee, OK★★★★★5/5
Meeker Nursing Center12.7 miMeeker, OK★★★☆☆3/5
Heritage Skilled Nursing and Therapy14.5 miTecumseh, OK★★★★☆4/5
Oak Hills Living Center14.7 miJones, OK★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Sienna Extended Care & Rehab15.3 miMidwest City, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Midwest City Post Acute & Rehab16.6 miMidwest City, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Emerald Care Center Midwest16.9 miMidwest City, OK★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in McLoud →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375347.